From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>,
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [announce] [patch] NX (No eXecute) support for x86, 2.6.7-rc2-bk2
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 09:21:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040603072146.GA14441@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0406021411030.3403@ppc970.osdl.org>
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> wrote:
> > If the NX feature is supported by the CPU then the patched kernel turns
> > on NX and it will enforce userspace executability constraints such as a
> > no-exec stack and no-exec mmap and data areas. This means less chance
> > for stack overflows and buffer-overflows to cause exploits.
>
> Just out of interest - how many legacy apps are broken by this? I
> assume it's a non-zero number, but wouldn't mind to be happily
> surprised.
in the full install of FC1 and FC2 the number is zero - and Fedora has
exec-shield which does a couple of things more: it makes the heap
non-executable as well [this broke X], it randomizes the address-space
layout and has a 4:4 VM [which broke the Sun JVM].
> And do we have some way of on a per-process basis say "avoid NX
> because this old version of Oracle/flash/whatever-binary-thing doesn't
> run with it"?
we have three mechanisms for this in Fedora:
1) the PT_GNU_STACK flag itself - you can turn executability on/off
compile-time or even after the fact via the execstack(8) utility
Jakub wrote. This only affects the stack's executability - if an
application assumes a non-PROT_EXEC mmap() can be executed it might
still break with NX - but based on experience with Fedora Core i'd
say there's almost no such application.
this method works in 2.6 too, since it supports PT_GNU_STACK. gcc's
PT_GNU_STACK mechanism is very conservative - e.g. if an application
does an asm() then gcc assumes that it might rely on stack executability
and emits the X flag. [applications can then turn this off in the source
if stack executability is not required.] Likewise, if gcc emits
trampolines then the X flag is emitted too. (glibc knows about
PT_GNU_STACK all across - so e.g. if a nonexec stack application
dlopen()s a library that needs stack executability then glibc makes the
stack executable on the fly via PROT_GROWSDOWN/GROWSUP.)
2) via a runtime method: via the i386 personality. So an application can
trigger the 'legacy' Linux VM layout by e.g doing 'i386 java
./test.class'.
this is a hack in Fedora - we wanted to have a finegrained runtime
mechanism just in case. But it would be nice to have this upstream too -
e.g. via a PERSONALITY_3G?
3) via a kernel boot parameter (exec-shield=0)
with the NX patch this becomes noexec=off [the same flag works on x86_64
too]. This method is the most inflexible one, and is a last-resort
thing. (Fedora also has a runtime global switch to turn off the VM
layout changes.)
here's a list of applications that we had to fix/work around in Fedora
when the VM layout changed:
- emacs _rebuild_. (it coredumps itself during build ... xemacs is OK.)
- some JDKs. Since they generate code and try to be as fast as possible
they tend to rely more on VM details than normal applications.
- X's module loader assumed that brk was executable. (fixed)
- Wine. (it implements another OS so it's by definition very sensitive
to layout changes.)
most of the breakages were unclean x86-only code that would have broken
if ported over to 64-bit anyway.
old, legacy applications dont have the PT_GNU_STACK flag so they all
work fine.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-03 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-02 20:50 [announce] [patch] NX (No eXecute) support for x86, 2.6.7-rc2-bk2 Ingo Molnar
2004-06-02 21:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-06-02 21:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-06-02 21:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-06-02 21:17 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-06-02 21:31 ` Doug McNaught
2004-06-08 8:46 ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-06-03 1:12 ` Joel Becker
2004-06-03 1:27 ` Andi Kleen
2004-06-03 6:24 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-06-03 20:37 ` jlnance
2004-06-03 7:21 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2004-06-03 12:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-06-03 15:54 ` Andi Kleen
2004-06-03 23:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2004-06-03 23:08 ` Andi Kleen
2004-06-03 23:54 ` Andy Lutomirski
2004-06-04 0:05 ` Andy Lutomirski
2004-06-04 9:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-06-04 15:26 ` Andy Lutomirski
2004-06-04 15:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-06-04 15:41 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-06-04 15:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-06-04 15:51 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-06-04 16:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-06-04 16:13 ` Andi Kleen
2004-06-04 16:37 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-06-04 16:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-06-04 17:27 ` David Mosberger
2004-06-04 17:30 ` Andi Kleen
2004-06-08 9:07 ` Jakub Jelinek
2004-06-08 9:14 ` Andi Kleen
2004-06-08 9:19 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-06-04 16:51 ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-06-08 17:15 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-06-04 18:11 ` Gerhard Mack
2004-06-04 18:12 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-06-04 16:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-06-04 17:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-06-04 17:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-06-04 17:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-06-03 19:24 ` Suresh Siddha
2004-06-03 20:37 ` Andi Kleen
2004-06-03 22:58 ` Suresh Siddha
2004-06-03 23:06 ` Andi Kleen
2004-06-04 9:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-06-03 12:57 ` Brian Gerst
2004-06-04 9:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-06-04 10:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-06-04 10:48 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-03 16:21 ` Ulrich Drepper
2004-06-03 19:30 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-06-02 21:43 ` Andi Kleen
2004-06-03 0:11 ` Rusty Russell
2004-06-03 0:17 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-03 7:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-06-03 8:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-06-03 8:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-06-04 0:04 ` Rusty Russell
2004-06-03 9:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-06-03 14:36 ` Gerhard Mack
2004-06-03 16:22 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-06-04 9:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-06-04 11:59 ` Stephen Wille Padnos
[not found] <22L0f-5Ci-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <22O7J-8dw-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <22Wf4-5Xv-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-06-03 9:43 ` Andi Kleen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-04 18:01 Nakajima, Jun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040603072146.GA14441@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.