[LARTC] htb filter

[LARTC] htb filter

[Svetozar Mihailov]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5938 bytes --]

Hello,

I have wrote some scripts to shape about 1000 workstations. 
My config:
Pentium IV - 2GHz, 1Gb RAM, RedHat Enterprise Advanced Server 3, kernel 2.4.21-9.EL, iproute-2.4.7-11.30E.1
2 Gigabit Lan cards in bridge mode.

I use htb. Everything work fine, but I have troubles with showing running configuration.

# Init shaper root for dev eth0
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 2: htb default 200
# Default shaper for dev eth0
tc class add dev eth0 parent 2:0 classid 2:200 htb rate 100Mbit prio 10
tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 2:200 sfq perturb 10
 
# Init NET1 shaper for dev eth0 , rate 30Mbit , ceil 40Mbit
tc class add dev eth0 parent 2:0 classid  2:30  htb rate 30Mbit ceil 40Mbit prio 1
tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent  2:30  sfq perturb 10
tc filter add dev eth0 parent 2:0 protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip src 192.168.1.0/24 flowid  2:30

# Init NET2 shaper for dev eth0 , rate 30Mbit , ceil 40Mbit
tc class add dev eth0 parent 2:0 classid  2:40  htb rate 30Mbit ceil 40Mbit prio 1
tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent  2:40  sfq perturb 10
tc filter add dev eth0 parent 2:0 protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip src 192.168.2.0/24 flowid  2:40

# User 1 - NET1
tc class add dev eth0 parent  2:30  classid 2:1001 htb rate 32Kbit ceil 256Kbit quantum 1514
tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 2:1001 sfq perturb 10
tc filter add dev eth0 parent  2:30  protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip dst 192.168.0.1/32 flowid 2:1001
# User 1 - NET2
tc class add dev eth0 parent  2:40  classid 2:2001 htb rate 32Kbit ceil 256Kbit quantum 1514
tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 2:2001 sfq perturb 10
tc filter add dev eth0 parent  2:40  protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip dst 192.168.0.1/32 flowid 2:2001

# User 2 - NET1
tc class add dev eth0 parent  2:30  classid 2:1002 htb rate 32Kbit ceil 256Kbit quantum 1514
tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 2:1002 sfq perturb 10
tc filter add dev eth0 parent  2:30  protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip dst 192.168.0.2/32 flowid 2:1002
# User 2 - NET2
tc class add dev eth0 parent  2:40  classid 2:2002 htb rate 32Kbit ceil 256Kbit quantum 1514
tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 2:2002 sfq perturb 10
tc filter add dev eth0 parent  2:40  protocol ip prio 1 u32 match ip dst 192.168.0.2/32 flowid 2:2002

At this point everything work fine, both User 1 and User 2 can get close to 256kbit from both networks in same time.
But when I try to show filters I get:

# tc filter ls dev eth0
filter parent 2: protocol ip pref 1 u32
filter parent 2: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 802: ht divisor 1
filter parent 2: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 802::800 order 2048 key ht 802 bkt 0 flowid 2:2001
  match c0a80001/ffffffff at 16
filter parent 2: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 802::801 order 2049 key ht 802 bkt 0 flowid 2:2002
  match c0a80002/ffffffff at 16
filter parent 2: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 801: ht divisor 1
filter parent 2: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 801::800 order 2048 key ht 801 bkt 0 flowid 2:1001
  match c0a80001/ffffffff at 16
filter parent 2: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 801::801 order 2049 key ht 801 bkt 0 flowid 2:1002
  match c0a80002/ffffffff at 16
filter parent 2: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 800: ht divisor 1
filter parent 2: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 800::800 order 2048 key ht 800 bkt 0 flowid 2:30
  match c0a80100/ffffff00 at 12
filter parent 2: protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 800::801 order 2049 key ht 800 bkt 0 flowid 2:40
  match c0a80200/ffffff00 at 12

It's look like ALL filters are attached to root class 2: which is not true, becouse all work as expected. 
If I try to specify classid in tc result is:

#tc filter ls dev eth0 parent 2:30
filter protocol ip pref 1 u32
filter protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 802: ht divisor 1
filter protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 802::800 order 2048 key ht 802 bkt 0 flowid 2:2001
  match c0a80001/ffffffff at 16
filter protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 802::801 order 2049 key ht 802 bkt 0 flowid 2:2002
  match c0a80002/ffffffff at 16
filter protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 801: ht divisor 1
filter protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 801::800 order 2048 key ht 801 bkt 0 flowid 2:1001
  match c0a80001/ffffffff at 16
filter protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 801::801 order 2049 key ht 801 bkt 0 flowid 2:1002
  match c0a80002/ffffffff at 16
filter protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 800: ht divisor 1
filter protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 800::800 order 2048 key ht 800 bkt 0 flowid 2:30
  match c0a80100/ffffff00 at 12
filter protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 800::801 order 2049 key ht 800 bkt 0 flowid 2:40
  match c0a80200/ffffff00 at 12

"parent" is disapearing from list, but I see ALL attached filters.

If I try to see 2:40 class result is exactly the same:

#tc filter ls dev eth0 parent 2:40
filter protocol ip pref 1 u32
filter protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 802: ht divisor 1
filter protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 802::800 order 2048 key ht 802 bkt 0 flowid 2:2001
  match c0a80001/ffffffff at 16
filter protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 802::801 order 2049 key ht 802 bkt 0 flowid 2:2002
  match c0a80002/ffffffff at 16
filter protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 801: ht divisor 1
filter protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 801::800 order 2048 key ht 801 bkt 0 flowid 2:1001
  match c0a80001/ffffffff at 16
filter protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 801::801 order 2049 key ht 801 bkt 0 flowid 2:1002
  match c0a80002/ffffffff at 16
filter protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 800: ht divisor 1
filter protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 800::800 order 2048 key ht 800 bkt 0 flowid 2:30
  match c0a80100/ffffff00 at 12
filter protocol ip pref 1 u32 fh 800::801 order 2049 key ht 800 bkt 0 flowid 2:40
  match c0a80200/ffffff00 at 12


I read in lartc.org that filter can be attached to any class, not only to root. I make my traffic control acording to that. And everything is fine.
I see thah filters are grouped. There is "fh 800::", but where is relation between "parent 2:0" and "fh 800::". Logicaly "parent 2:30" => "fh 801::" and "parent 2:40" => "fh 802::". 

What I'm missing?

Regards,
Svetozar





[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 8341 bytes --]

Re: [LARTC] htb filter

[Ed Wildgoose]

Shouldn't this:  

>
> tc class add dev eth0 parent 2:0 classid 2:200 htb rate 100Mbit prio 10


be "parent 2:"?

Ed W

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] htb filter

[Svetozar Mihailov]

> Shouldn't this:
>
> >
> > tc class add dev eth0 parent 2:0 classid 2:200 htb rate 100Mbit prio 10
>
>
> be "parent 2:"?
>
> Ed W
>

That change nothing. I have running system with 800 PC , 4 classes for each.
There is no difference for me in using "parent 2:" vs "parent 2:0". Both
give same result.

Svetozar.

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] htb filter

[Jason Boxman]

On Wednesday 23 June 2004 01:57, Svetozar Mihailov wrote:
> > Shouldn't this:
> > > tc class add dev eth0 parent 2:0 classid 2:200 htb rate 100Mbit prio 10
> >
> > be "parent 2:"?
> >
> > Ed W
>
> That change nothing. I have running system with 800 PC , 4 classes for
> each. There is no difference for me in using "parent 2:" vs "parent 2:0".
> Both give same result.

Exactly.  2: is simply a short hand for 2:0, for example.

-- 

Jason Boxman
Perl Programmer / *NIX Systems Administrator
Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing | University of Florida
http://edseek.com/ - Linux and FOSS stuff

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/