All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Werner Almesberger <wa@almesberger.net>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Cc: Bryan Henderson <hbryan@us.ibm.com>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: barriers vs. reads - O_DIRECT
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 17:55:16 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040624175516.W1325@almesberger.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040624185059.GA11175@mail.shareable.org>; from jamie@shareable.org on Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 07:50:59PM +0100

Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Note that what filesystems and databases want is write-write *partial
> dependencies*.  The per-device I/O barrier is just a crude
> approximation.

True ;-) So what would an ideally flexible model look like ?
Partial order ? Triggers plus virtual requests ? There's also
the little issue that this should still yield an interface
that people can understand without taking a semester of
graph theory ;-)

> 3. What if a journal is on a different device to its filesystem?

"Don't do this" comes to mind :-)

> Isn't the barrier itself an I/O operation which can be waited on?
> I agree something could depend on the reads at the moment.

Making barriers waitable might be very useful, yes. That could
also be a step towards implementing those cross-device barriers.

- Werner

-- 
  _________________________________________________________________________
 / Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina         wa@almesberger.net /
/_http://www.almesberger.net/____________________________________________/

  reply	other threads:[~2004-06-24 20:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-24  0:48 barriers vs. reads Werner Almesberger
2004-06-24  3:39 ` Werner Almesberger
2004-06-24  8:00   ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-06-24 12:16     ` Werner Almesberger
2004-06-24 13:36   ` Jamie Lokier
2004-06-24 17:02     ` Werner Almesberger
2004-06-24 16:39 ` Steve Lord
2004-06-24 17:00 ` barriers vs. reads - O_DIRECT Bryan Henderson
2004-06-24 17:46   ` Werner Almesberger
2004-06-24 18:50     ` Jamie Lokier
2004-06-24 20:55       ` Werner Almesberger [this message]
2004-06-24 22:42         ` Jamie Lokier
2004-06-25  3:21           ` Werner Almesberger
2004-06-25  3:57           ` Guy
2004-06-25  4:52             ` Werner Almesberger
2004-06-25  0:11     ` Bryan Henderson
2004-06-25  2:42       ` Werner Almesberger
2004-06-25 15:59         ` barriers vs. reads - O_DIRECT aio Bryan Henderson
2004-06-25 16:31         ` barriers vs. reads - O_DIRECT Bryan Henderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040624175516.W1325@almesberger.net \
    --to=wa@almesberger.net \
    --cc=hbryan@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=jamie@shareable.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.