* Tree issues, fsck output @ 2004-06-29 20:19 mjt 2004-06-30 6:45 ` mjt 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: mjt @ 2004-06-29 20:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: reiserfs-list; +Cc: sikkh Hi! ***** Tree Traverse Pass: scanning the reiser4 internal tree. FSCK: Node (2013064): The last key [377f5f:4(FB):2e616339375f63:3a45d8:99] in 2 the node is greater then the right delimiting key [2fa6e:4(FB):6c69626d70342e:1e88ad:1f7c]. FSCK: Node (469959), item (28), unit (0): Points to the node [2013064] with wrong delimiting keys. The whole subtree is skipped. Error: Can't open node 2014146. FSCK: Node (2014146): failed to open the node pointed by the node (469959), item(29), unit (0) on the level (2). The whole subtree is skipped. Error: Can't open node 2014147. FSCK: Node (2014147): failed to open the node pointed by the node (469959), item(30), unit (0) on the level (2). The whole subtree is skipped. FSCK: Node (469959), item (31), unit (0): Points to the block (2014148) which isin the tree already. The whole subtree is skipped. How deep is the shit I'm in? :P What brought this on? I'll just send this post now, I'll send a follow-up when I'm re-doing fsck with some switches. This was just a basic fsck /dev/hda1, so maybe no need to panic yet... -- mjt ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Tree issues, fsck output 2004-06-29 20:19 Tree issues, fsck output mjt @ 2004-06-30 6:45 ` mjt 2004-06-30 9:03 ` mjt 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: mjt @ 2004-06-30 6:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: reiserfs-list; +Cc: sikkh On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 11:19:56PM +0300, Markus Törnqvist wrote: > >I'll just send this post now, I'll send a follow-up when I'm re-doing >fsck with some switches. This was just a basic fsck /dev/hda1, so maybe >no need to panic yet... So I proceeded to --build-fs FSCK: Node (481195), item (5), [2fa6e:6c69626d70342e:1e88ae] (stat40): wrong bytes (939), Fixed to (0). FSCK: Directory [2fa68:496e7075742e64:2fa6e]: can't find the object [2fa6e:6c69626d70342e:1e88ad] pointed by the entry [libmp4.so]. Entry is removed. Anyway, that finished with a consistent fs.. Now that I'm back in my real environment: mjt@shrike:~$ xmms & [1] 3752 mjt@shrike:~$ /usr/lib/xmms/Input/libtonegen.so: invalid ELF header /usr/lib/xmms/Input/libwav.so: invalid ELF header /usr/lib/xmms/Effect/libecho.so: invalid ELF header /usr/lib/xmms/Effect/libstereo.so: invalid ELF header /usr/lib/xmms/Effect/libvoice.so: invalid ELF header So I try to reinstall xmms: mjt@shrike:~$ sudo apt-get install xmms Reading Package Lists... 93% And it sticks there AGAIN! So now I'll just compile the new auto-snapshot and see what happens... -- mjt ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Tree issues, fsck output 2004-06-30 6:45 ` mjt @ 2004-06-30 9:03 ` mjt 2004-06-30 9:24 ` Vitaly Fertman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: mjt @ 2004-06-30 9:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: reiserfs-list; +Cc: sikkh On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 09:45:47AM +0300, Markus Törnqvist wrote: >So now I'll just compile the new auto-snapshot and see what happens... It did not work. http://mjt.nysv.org/reiser/Reiser4-2004.06.29/ Pictures once again courtesy of my trusty phone, so the quality truly does suck. So, err, I'm doing a plain fsck now again, to see if that is the result of some corruption, but it went to the extremely non-verbose semantic tree pass... I'm at a loss here, if the new kernel doesn't bother to boot and the old one doesn't really work. Vitaly, do you have some ideas for me? Do you want my metadata somewhere? I doubt anyone checked yet if the mainline 2.6.7 port of the snapshot I used was to blame, but at least now I'm trying with a standard one.. If the semantic tree pass goes cleanly and the fs is consistent, I will try older auto-snapshots, despite the fact that the earlier mm's are not highly recommended. Thanks! -- mjt ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Tree issues, fsck output 2004-06-30 9:03 ` mjt @ 2004-06-30 9:24 ` Vitaly Fertman 2004-06-30 9:42 ` mjt 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Vitaly Fertman @ 2004-06-30 9:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Markus TЖrnqvist, reiserfs-list; +Cc: sikkh On Wednesday 30 June 2004 13:03, Markus Törnqvist wrote: > On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 09:45:47AM +0300, Markus Törnqvist wrote: > >So now I'll just compile the new auto-snapshot and see what happens... > > It did not work. > > http://mjt.nysv.org/reiser/Reiser4-2004.06.29/ > Pictures once again courtesy of my trusty phone, so the quality truly > does suck. > > So, err, I'm doing a plain fsck now again, to see if that is the result > of some corruption, but it went to the extremely non-verbose semantic > tree pass... it prints all found corruptions. could you send them ? btw, I hvae already added gauge to the semantic pass. Hopefully will release another progs snapshot or internal-snapshot on days. > I'm at a loss here, if the new kernel doesn't bother to boot and the > old one doesn't really work. if I recall correctly the only corruption was wrong directory entry, right? or it fould some more while you were sleeping? > Vitaly, do you have some ideas for me? Do you want my metadata somewhere? could you run fsck.reiser4 in check mode again after rebuilding to be sure that evth has been fixed. If you have matadata packed before rebuilding, not after, and you can provide them for downloading, it would be useful. > I doubt anyone checked yet if the mainline 2.6.7 port of the snapshot > I used was to blame, but at least now I'm trying with a standard one.. > > If the semantic tree pass goes cleanly and the fs is consistent, I will > try older auto-snapshots, despite the fact that the earlier mm's are > not highly recommended. to reproduce this we need to know which steps lead to such corruptions. -- Thanks, Vitaly Fertman ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Tree issues, fsck output 2004-06-30 9:24 ` Vitaly Fertman @ 2004-06-30 9:42 ` mjt 2004-06-30 10:43 ` mjt 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: mjt @ 2004-06-30 9:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vitaly Fertman; +Cc: reiserfs-list, sikkh On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 01:24:34PM +0400, Vitaly Fertman wrote: >it prints all found corruptions. could you send them ? The thing is, now that 2.6.7-mm4, latest auto-snapshot, failed, I didn't get any errors with fsck... So it seems my filesystem is all alright, at least for the time being. >btw, I hvae already added gauge to the semantic pass. Hopefully will >release another progs snapshot or internal-snapshot on days. That would be great! Any hints on what else to expect beyond the gauge?-) >if I recall correctly the only corruption was wrong directory entry, right? >or it fould some more while you were sleeping? Nope, nada, the last I pasted to you, libmp4, was also the last failure. Then I think I posted here that xmms wouldn't reinstall and there were bad ELF headers. >could you run fsck.reiser4 in check mode again after rebuilding to be sure >that evth has been fixed. If you have matadata packed before rebuilding, >not after, and you can provide them for downloading, it would be useful. I'm taking a debugfs.reiser4 -P /dev/hda1 now. Then I will run additional stuff, but it still seems like the FS is ok.... >> If the semantic tree pass goes cleanly and the fs is consistent, I will >> try older auto-snapshots, despite the fact that the earlier mm's are >> not highly recommended. >to reproduce this we need to know which steps lead to such corruptions. Yeah, but it ain't easy. I'd like to hear what changes were made when porting the snapshot to mainline. If that could possibly induce corruption. Anyway, I think this part of the discussion is redundant, as the big problem now remaining is that the 2004.06.29 auto-snapshot doesn't boot. If it presents these problems, with sibling check and all that enabled, I will have more details for you. -- mjt ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Tree issues, fsck output 2004-06-30 9:42 ` mjt @ 2004-06-30 10:43 ` mjt 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: mjt @ 2004-06-30 10:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vitaly Fertman; +Cc: reiserfs-list, sikkh On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 12:42:25PM +0300, Markus Törnqvist wrote: > >I'm taking a debugfs.reiser4 -P /dev/hda1 now. >Then I will run additional stuff, but it still seems like the FS is ok.... Yeah, I have the metadata dump now, and I will send it to you if you feel you need it, but the additional fsck reported clean results. I will proceed to compiling a new kernel, with an older auto-snap. Thanks! -- mjt ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-06-30 10:43 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2004-06-29 20:19 Tree issues, fsck output mjt 2004-06-30 6:45 ` mjt 2004-06-30 9:03 ` mjt 2004-06-30 9:24 ` Vitaly Fertman 2004-06-30 9:42 ` mjt 2004-06-30 10:43 ` mjt
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.