All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
To: Norberto Bensa <norberto+linux-kernel@bensa.ath.cx>
Cc: Jan Knutar <jk-lkml@sci.fi>, L A Walsh <lkml@tlinx.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: XFS: how to NOT null files on fsck?
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 12:19:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040710191914.GA5471@taniwha.stupidest.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200407101555.27278.norberto+linux-kernel@bensa.ath.cx>

On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 03:55:26PM -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote:

> I think we all know that. The point, why the hell does it null
> files?

A decision was made somewhere this is better than showing potentially
bogus or confidential data, so on log-reply some parts of files may be
zeroed.  I can see arguments for an againts this and clearly for a lot
of people the zeroing is a real pain.

It would be nice for some people to prevent log-replay zeroing files
but then something would have to be able to determine whether or not
these blocks were newly allocated (and this might contain confidential
data and need to be zeroed) or previously part of the file in which
case we probably would like them left alone.

I don't know any of the code well enough to know how easy this is or
even if I'm telling the truth :) Hopefully someone who does can speak
up on this.


  --cw

  reply	other threads:[~2004-07-10 19:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-05  5:47 XFS: how to NOT null files on fsck? Norberto Bensa
2004-07-09 16:37 ` L A Walsh
2004-07-09 21:59   ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-07-10 18:33     ` L A Walsh
2004-07-10 18:43       ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-07-10 21:24         ` Bernd Eckenfels
2004-07-11 21:54           ` Helge Hafting
2004-07-12 17:56             ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-07-12 19:59               ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-07-12 20:32                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-07-12 22:29                 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2004-07-12 23:03       ` Bernd Eckenfels
2004-07-12 23:14         ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-07-10 18:43     ` Jan Knutar
2004-07-10 18:46       ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-07-10 18:55         ` Norberto Bensa
2004-07-10 19:19           ` Chris Wedgwood [this message]
2004-07-12 21:20             ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-07-12 22:40               ` L A Walsh
2004-07-12 22:53                 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-07-13  1:44                   ` Bernd Eckenfels
2004-07-13  5:24                     ` Chris Wedgwood
     [not found]             ` <2hgxc-5x9-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-07-13  7:25               ` Anton Ertl
2004-07-13  8:09                 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-07-13  9:34                   ` Anton Ertl
2004-07-13  9:53                     ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-07-13 10:27                       ` Tim Connors
2004-07-13 10:38                         ` ismail dönmez
2004-07-13 11:16                           ` Nick Piggin
2004-07-13 12:52                             ` ismail dönmez
2004-07-13 10:58                         ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-07-13 13:33                       ` Anton Ertl
2004-07-13 20:32                         ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-07-13 22:42                           ` Bernd Eckenfels
2004-07-14 18:49                           ` Anton Ertl
2004-07-14 19:00                             ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-07-13 22:24                 ` Helge Hafting
2004-07-13 22:39                   ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-07-13 23:23                   ` Bernd Eckenfels
2004-07-14 18:53                   ` Anton Ertl
2004-07-10 19:33           ` Andreas Schwab
2004-07-10 19:40             ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-07-10 19:46             ` Norberto Bensa
2004-07-10 20:03               ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-07-11  1:21           ` Gopikrishnan Sidhardhan
2004-07-29  1:30   ` Nathan Scott
2004-08-03 18:31     ` L A Walsh
2004-08-04  0:48       ` Andi Kleen
2004-08-04  6:37         ` L A Walsh
2004-08-05  8:16       ` Helge Hafting
2004-08-06  1:10         ` Nathan Scott
2004-08-06  1:34           ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040710191914.GA5471@taniwha.stupidest.org \
    --to=cw@f00f.org \
    --cc=jk-lkml@sci.fi \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkml@tlinx.org \
    --cc=norberto+linux-kernel@bensa.ath.cx \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.