From: "S Mohan" <smohan@vsnl.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [LARTC] the "cisco vs. Linux" thread
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 14:48:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040712044254.528804008@outpost.ds9a.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040708193300.GA30890@mabeys.dsl.aros.net>
You could try the following:
1. http://www.axiomtech.com.tw
2. http://www.soekris.com
3. http://www.pcengines.com
4. http://www.nexedi.org
5. http://www.nagasaki.com.tw
6. http://www.iei.com.tw
7. http://www.advantech.com
8. http://www.lannerinc.com
An a lot more. Nagasaki is good and has a few good options. Cheapest of the
lot. Most of these are Taiwanese/Chinese companies with US offices.
Warm regards
Mohan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lartc-admin@mailman.ds9a.nl
> [mailto:lartc-admin@mailman.ds9a.nl] On Behalf Of Glen Mabey
> Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2004 4:22 AM
> To: LARTC Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [LARTC] the "cisco vs. Linux" thread
>
> On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 10:35:22AM -0400, Alfie Viechweg wrote:
> > Regarding building your own router/switch. You might want
> to check out
> > www.routerboard.com for a really reasonably priced 4 port NIC.
>
> I had no idea this type of board existed! (forgive my excitement)
>
> Alfie, have you used the Routerboard 230 or 240 products?
> Anyone else?
>
> Could anyone else recommend other manufacturers of this type of
> hardware: an embedded system board with
> * a couple of NICs
> * PCMCIA
> * runs linux
>
> Thanks --
> Glen
>
> --
> ******************************************************************
> Glen W. Mabey
> Glen.Mabey@usu.edu
> http://mabeys.homelinux.com/glen/
> ******************************************************************
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-11 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-08 19:33 [LARTC] the "cisco vs. Linux" thread Glen Mabey
2004-07-08 21:38 ` Nicholas Erkert
2004-07-08 21:44 ` Nicholas Erkert
2004-07-09 9:47 ` Jeff Green
2004-07-09 14:35 ` Alfie Viechweg
2004-07-10 22:51 ` Glen Mabey
2004-07-10 23:25 ` Glen Mabey
2004-07-11 0:36 ` Dmitry Golubev
2004-07-11 14:48 ` S Mohan [this message]
2004-07-11 17:15 ` James Sneeringer
2004-07-11 18:48 ` José Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa
2004-07-12 7:18 ` przemolicc
2004-07-12 8:15 ` Abraham van der Merwe
2004-07-12 8:39 ` przemolicc
2004-07-12 9:33 ` przemolicc
2004-07-12 14:33 ` José Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa
2004-07-12 15:48 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-07-12 16:01 ` José Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa
2004-07-13 7:22 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-07-13 11:49 ` Alfie Viechweg
2004-07-13 13:44 ` Ed Wildgoose
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040712044254.528804008@outpost.ds9a.nl \
--to=smohan@vsnl.com \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.