All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ed Wildgoose <lists@wildgooses.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] the "cisco vs. Linux" thread
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 15:48:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <40F2B2E0.3000103@wildgooses.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040708193300.GA30890@mabeys.dsl.aros.net>


>> Alfie, have you used the Routerboard 230 or 240 products?  Anyone else?
>>
>> Could anyone else recommend other manufacturers of this type of
>> hardware: an embedded system board with * a couple of NICs
>> * PCMCIA
>> * runs linux
>
>
> This one, and its cheaper:
>
> http://www.soekris.com/


Actually, I am really interested in this kind of hardware.  But it's 
actually not really as cheap as it looks.  (Bear in mind I am based in 
the UK so I am looking post-shipping price)

Most of these tiny embeded devices need $20-30 or powersupply, and same 
again for a case, and a bit of RAM...  It looks like around £300 
sterling to me all in.  However, you can often pickup a bottom of the 
range Compaq/HP server for that price... (OK, not as small and neat!)

There are some really nice and neat little boxes, which would be good 
for a mid-priced box where you need the grunt. 

...But for low end hardware it seems hard to beat the Linksys WRT54GS 
which is around £50 GPB from ebuyer....  This gets you 32Mb and a 200Mhz 
processor! (and 2 net cards, a small switch and a wireless radio!)

The "S" model is only starting to arrive in the UK so mine's on 
backorder, but I think it's easily available in the US?

Ed W
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-07-12 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-08 19:33 [LARTC] the "cisco vs. Linux" thread Glen Mabey
2004-07-08 21:38 ` Nicholas Erkert
2004-07-08 21:44 ` Nicholas Erkert
2004-07-09  9:47 ` Jeff Green
2004-07-09 14:35 ` Alfie Viechweg
2004-07-10 22:51 ` Glen Mabey
2004-07-10 23:25 ` Glen Mabey
2004-07-11  0:36 ` Dmitry Golubev
2004-07-11 14:48 ` S Mohan
2004-07-11 17:15 ` James Sneeringer
2004-07-11 18:48 ` José Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa
2004-07-12  7:18 ` przemolicc
2004-07-12  8:15 ` Abraham van der Merwe
2004-07-12  8:39 ` przemolicc
2004-07-12  9:33 ` przemolicc
2004-07-12 14:33 ` José Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa
2004-07-12 15:48 ` Ed Wildgoose [this message]
2004-07-12 16:01 ` José Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa
2004-07-13  7:22 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-07-13 11:49 ` Alfie Viechweg
2004-07-13 13:44 ` Ed Wildgoose

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=40F2B2E0.3000103@wildgooses.com \
    --to=lists@wildgooses.com \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.