From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>
To: <Stuart_Hayes@Dell.com>
Cc: <whbeers@mbio.ncsu.edu>, <david-b@pacbell.net>, <olh@suse.de>,
<Gary_Lerhaupt@Dell.com>, <linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
zaitcev@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] proper bios handoff in ehci-hcd
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 14:56:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040713145628.27ae43e7@lembas.zaitcev.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7A8F92187EF7A249BF847F1BF4903C046304CF@ausx2kmpc103.aus.amer.dell.com>
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 15:52:43 -0500
<Stuart_Hayes@Dell.com> wrote:
> the "OS wants the controller" bit is getting written to 1 (first part of
> the Linux write, which the system broke into pieces)
If something breaks word writes into pieces, all hell breaks lose.
I don't believe it can happen.
I hit regressions when we implemented the proper handoff as requested
by Stuart @Dell, so I think for the moment the right thing would be this:
--- linux-2.4.21-15.18.EL/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c 2004-07-01
08:07:56.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.4.21-15.18-usb/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c 2004-07-08
15:15:05.944863675 -0700
@@ -302,7 +302,8 @@
if (cap & (1 << 16)) {
ehci_err (ehci, "BIOS handoff failed (%d, %04x)\n",
where, cap);
- return 1;
+ pci_write_config_dword (ehci->hcd.pdev, where, 0);
+ return 0;
}
ehci_dbg (ehci, "BIOS handoff succeeded\n");
}
Essentially, here I insist on doing the right thing with cap|=(1<<24),
which fixes Dell boxes which implement proper handoff, but then if we
time out as on Thinkpads, write zero as the old code did (probably
pointless, but just to be safe) and continue.
David, any comment?
-- Pete
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-13 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-13 20:52 [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] proper bios handoff in ehci-hcd Stuart_Hayes
2004-07-13 21:56 ` Pete Zaitcev [this message]
2004-07-13 23:04 ` David Brownell
2004-07-15 9:37 ` Olaf Hering
2004-08-05 13:39 ` Olaf Hering
2004-08-05 15:49 ` David Brownell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-14 20:30 Gary_Lerhaupt
2004-06-15 13:57 ` [linux-usb-devel] " David Brownell
2004-07-13 18:07 ` Olaf Hering
2004-07-13 20:26 ` David Brownell
2004-07-13 20:44 ` Will Beers
2004-07-13 21:11 ` David Brownell
2004-07-13 21:24 ` Will Beers
2004-07-13 21:35 ` David Brownell
2004-07-13 21:43 ` Will Beers
2004-07-13 21:31 ` Will Beers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040713145628.27ae43e7@lembas.zaitcev.lan \
--to=zaitcev@redhat.com \
--cc=Gary_Lerhaupt@Dell.com \
--cc=Stuart_Hayes@Dell.com \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=olh@suse.de \
--cc=whbeers@mbio.ncsu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.