From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the posix-timer functions to return higher
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 21:09:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040714210903.GA32326@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0407140940260.14704@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 09:41:03AM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> The following patch introduces a new gettimeofday function using
> struct timespec instead of struct timeval. If a platforms supports time
> interpolation then the new gettimeofday will use that to provide a
> gettimeofday function with higher accuracy and then also clock_gettime
> will return with nanosecond accuracy.
You seem to have included two patches here that are very similar ...
could you send the patch you intended please?
--
"Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon
the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those
conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse
to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince
himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep
he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark Twain
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the posix-timer functions to return higher accuracy)
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 22:09:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040714210903.GA32326@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0407140940260.14704@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 09:41:03AM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> The following patch introduces a new gettimeofday function using
> struct timespec instead of struct timeval. If a platforms supports time
> interpolation then the new gettimeofday will use that to provide a
> gettimeofday function with higher accuracy and then also clock_gettime
> will return with nanosecond accuracy.
You seem to have included two patches here that are very similar ...
could you send the patch you intended please?
--
"Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon
the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those
conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse
to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince
himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep
he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark Twain
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-14 21:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-14 16:41 gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the posix-timer Christoph Lameter
2004-07-14 16:41 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the posix-timer functions to return higher accuracy) Christoph Lameter
2004-07-14 20:09 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the john stultz
2004-07-14 20:09 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the posix-timer functions to return higher accuracy) john stultz
2004-07-14 20:28 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the Christoph Lameter
2004-07-14 20:28 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the posix-timer functions to return higher accuracy) Christoph Lameter
2004-07-14 21:14 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the David Mosberger
2004-07-14 21:14 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the posix-timer functions to return higher accuracy) David Mosberger
2004-07-14 21:15 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the john stultz
2004-07-14 21:15 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the posix-timer functions to return higher accuracy) john stultz
2004-07-15 0:08 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the Christoph Lameter
2004-07-15 0:08 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the posix-timer functions to return higher accuracy) Christoph Lameter
2004-07-15 0:48 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the john stultz
2004-07-15 0:48 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the posix-timer functions to return higher accuracy) john stultz
2004-07-15 1:16 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the David Mosberger
2004-07-15 1:16 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the posix-timer functions to return higher accuracy) David Mosberger
2004-07-15 1:35 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the john stultz
2004-07-15 1:35 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the posix-timer functions to return higher accuracy) john stultz
2004-07-15 3:57 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the David Mosberger
2004-07-15 3:57 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the posix-timer functions to return higher accuracy) David Mosberger
2004-07-15 15:31 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the Christoph Lameter
2004-07-15 15:31 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the posix-timer functions to return higher accuracy) Christoph Lameter
2004-07-15 16:14 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the john stultz
2004-07-15 16:14 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the posix-timer functions to return higher accuracy) john stultz
2004-07-15 17:03 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the Christoph Lameter
2004-07-15 17:03 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the posix-timer functions to return higher accuracy) Christoph Lameter
2004-07-15 17:18 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the john stultz
2004-07-15 17:18 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the posix-timer functions to return higher accuracy) john stultz
2004-07-15 22:59 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the posix-timer George Anzinger
2004-07-15 22:59 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the posix-timer functions to return higher accuracy) George Anzinger
2004-07-16 2:44 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the Christoph Lameter
2004-07-16 2:44 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the posix-timer functions to return higher accuracy) Christoph Lameter
2004-07-14 21:09 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2004-07-14 21:09 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-07-14 21:27 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the Christoph Lameter
2004-07-14 21:27 ` gettimeofday nanoseconds patch (makes it possible for the posix-timer functions to return higher accuracy) Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040714210903.GA32326@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
--to=willy@debian.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.