From: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
To: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PATCH] Locking optimization for cache_reap
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:05:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040723190555.GB16956@sgi.com> (raw)
Here is another cache_reap optimization that reduces latency when
applied after the 'Move cache_reap out of timer context' patch I
submitted on 7/14 (for inclusion in -mm next week).
This applies to 2.6.8-rc2 + the above mentioned patch.
Signed-off-by: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
Index: linux/mm/slab.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/mm/slab.c
+++ linux/mm/slab.c
@@ -2619,27 +2619,6 @@ static void enable_cpucache (kmem_cache_
cachep->name, -err);
}
-static void drain_array(kmem_cache_t *cachep, struct array_cache *ac)
-{
- int tofree;
-
- check_irq_off();
- if (ac->touched) {
- ac->touched = 0;
- } else if (ac->avail) {
- tofree = (ac->limit+4)/5;
- if (tofree > ac->avail) {
- tofree = (ac->avail+1)/2;
- }
- spin_lock(&cachep->spinlock);
- free_block(cachep, ac_entry(ac), tofree);
- spin_unlock(&cachep->spinlock);
- ac->avail -= tofree;
- memmove(&ac_entry(ac)[0], &ac_entry(ac)[tofree],
- sizeof(void*)*ac->avail);
- }
-}
-
static void drain_array_locked(kmem_cache_t *cachep,
struct array_cache *ac, int force)
{
@@ -2697,16 +2676,14 @@ static void cache_reap (void *unused)
goto next;
check_irq_on();
- local_irq_disable();
- drain_array(searchp, ac_data(searchp));
- if(time_after(searchp->lists.next_reap, jiffies))
- goto next_irqon;
+ spin_lock_irq(&searchp->spinlock);
+
+ drain_array_locked(searchp, ac_data(searchp), 0);
- spin_lock(&searchp->spinlock);
- if(time_after(searchp->lists.next_reap, jiffies)) {
+ if(time_after(searchp->lists.next_reap, jiffies))
goto next_unlock;
- }
+
searchp->lists.next_reap = jiffies + REAPTIMEOUT_LIST3;
if (searchp->lists.shared)
@@ -2739,9 +2716,7 @@ static void cache_reap (void *unused)
spin_lock_irq(&searchp->spinlock);
} while(--tofree > 0);
next_unlock:
- spin_unlock(&searchp->spinlock);
-next_irqon:
- local_irq_enable();
+ spin_unlock_irq(&searchp->spinlock);
next:
;
}
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
To: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PATCH] Locking optimization for cache_reap
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:05:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040723190555.GB16956@sgi.com> (raw)
Here is another cache_reap optimization that reduces latency when
applied after the 'Move cache_reap out of timer context' patch I
submitted on 7/14 (for inclusion in -mm next week).
This applies to 2.6.8-rc2 + the above mentioned patch.
Signed-off-by: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
Index: linux/mm/slab.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/mm/slab.c
+++ linux/mm/slab.c
@@ -2619,27 +2619,6 @@ static void enable_cpucache (kmem_cache_
cachep->name, -err);
}
-static void drain_array(kmem_cache_t *cachep, struct array_cache *ac)
-{
- int tofree;
-
- check_irq_off();
- if (ac->touched) {
- ac->touched = 0;
- } else if (ac->avail) {
- tofree = (ac->limit+4)/5;
- if (tofree > ac->avail) {
- tofree = (ac->avail+1)/2;
- }
- spin_lock(&cachep->spinlock);
- free_block(cachep, ac_entry(ac), tofree);
- spin_unlock(&cachep->spinlock);
- ac->avail -= tofree;
- memmove(&ac_entry(ac)[0], &ac_entry(ac)[tofree],
- sizeof(void*)*ac->avail);
- }
-}
-
static void drain_array_locked(kmem_cache_t *cachep,
struct array_cache *ac, int force)
{
@@ -2697,16 +2676,14 @@ static void cache_reap (void *unused)
goto next;
check_irq_on();
- local_irq_disable();
- drain_array(searchp, ac_data(searchp));
- if(time_after(searchp->lists.next_reap, jiffies))
- goto next_irqon;
+ spin_lock_irq(&searchp->spinlock);
+
+ drain_array_locked(searchp, ac_data(searchp), 0);
- spin_lock(&searchp->spinlock);
- if(time_after(searchp->lists.next_reap, jiffies)) {
+ if(time_after(searchp->lists.next_reap, jiffies))
goto next_unlock;
- }
+
searchp->lists.next_reap = jiffies + REAPTIMEOUT_LIST3;
if (searchp->lists.shared)
@@ -2739,9 +2716,7 @@ static void cache_reap (void *unused)
spin_lock_irq(&searchp->spinlock);
} while(--tofree > 0);
next_unlock:
- spin_unlock(&searchp->spinlock);
-next_irqon:
- local_irq_enable();
+ spin_unlock_irq(&searchp->spinlock);
next:
;
}
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2004-07-23 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-23 19:05 Dimitri Sivanich [this message]
2004-07-23 19:05 ` [PATCH] Locking optimization for cache_reap Dimitri Sivanich
2004-07-27 1:01 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-27 1:01 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-27 1:47 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2004-07-27 1:47 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2004-07-27 1:59 ` Aroop MP
2004-07-27 1:59 ` Aroop MP
[not found] ` <20040727020338.GB23967@sgi.com>
2004-07-27 2:11 ` lsattr: Inappropriate ioctl for device While reading flags!!! Aroop MP
2004-07-27 2:11 ` Aroop MP
2004-07-27 6:40 ` Philippe Troin
2004-07-27 6:40 ` Philippe Troin
2004-07-27 2:01 ` [PATCH] Locking optimization for cache_reap Dimitri Sivanich
2004-07-27 2:01 ` Dimitri Sivanich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040723190555.GB16956@sgi.com \
--to=sivanich@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.