From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: olh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org, Sylvain Munaut <tnt@246tNt.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][PPC32] Makefile cleanups and gcc-3.4+binutils-2.14 check
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:00:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040728150052.4effe78a.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040728154630.GN10891@smtp.west.cox.net>
Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>
> The following patch does three things. First, it removes all instances
> of:
> ifeq ($(CONFIG_FOO),y)
> AFLAGS += -Wa,-mfoo
> endif
>
> and makes us set them once in arch/ppc/Makefile, via
> aflags-$(CONFIG_FOO), just like we do for CFLAGS. Next it adds a test
> for gcc-3.4 and binutils-2.14. The problem with this combination is
> that the -many flag is broken in binutils-2.14 and gcc-3.4 will pass it
> down, causing other flags to be overridden and the compile to fail.
> Changing gcc or binutils versions fixes this. Finally, it changes
> places in the Makefiles where we did:
> ifeq ($(CONFIG_FOO),y)
> obj-$(CONFIG_BAR) += foo_bar.o
> endif
> into
> obj-$(CONFIG_FOO) += $(bar-y)
> bar-$(CONFIG_BAR) += foo_bar.o
Unfortunately this has significant clashes with the mpc52xx bk tree
which I'm carrying.
That patch has been sitting around for several weeks now - can we get it
merged up first?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-28 21:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-28 15:46 [PATCH][PPC32] Makefile cleanups and gcc-3.4+binutils-2.14 check Tom Rini
2004-07-28 22:00 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2004-07-28 22:07 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-28 22:51 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-29 15:04 ` Sylvain Munaut
2004-07-29 8:05 ` [PATCH][PPC32] Makefile cleanups and gcc-3.4+binutils-2.14 c Giuliano Pochini
2004-07-29 14:43 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-30 18:59 ` Giuliano Pochini
2004-07-30 19:07 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-30 20:48 ` Giuliano Pochini
2004-07-30 21:03 ` Tom Rini
2004-07-31 12:53 ` Giuliano Pochini
2004-08-02 15:43 ` Tom Rini
2004-08-04 10:22 ` Wolfram Quester
2004-08-04 10:41 ` Guido Guenther
2004-08-04 12:37 ` Guido Guenther
2004-08-05 14:12 ` Olaf Hering
2004-08-05 16:54 ` Tom Rini
2004-08-05 17:00 ` Olaf Hering
2004-08-05 17:20 ` Tom Rini
2004-08-05 17:39 ` Olaf Hering
2004-08-05 18:03 ` Tom Rini
2004-08-05 18:00 ` Olaf Hering
2004-08-05 18:14 ` Tom Rini
2004-08-05 19:04 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-08-05 21:03 ` Matt Porter
2004-08-06 15:32 ` Olaf Hering
[not found] ` <hhacx8hirb.fsf@alsvidh.mathematik.uni-muenchen.de>
2004-08-06 15:38 ` [PATCH] ppc32: Fix building of certain CPU types (Was: Re: [PATCH][PPC32] Makefile cleanups and gcc-3.4+binutils-2.14) Tom Rini
2004-08-02 7:45 ` [PATCH][PPC32] Makefile cleanups and gcc-3.4+binutils-2.14 c Olaf Hering
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040728150052.4effe78a.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=olh@suse.de \
--cc=tnt@246tNt.com \
--cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.