From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.de>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: post-OLS pending cpufreq patches
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 19:25:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040728172529.GC8678@dominikbrodowski.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040728135916.GA6308@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 02:59:16PM +0100, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 10:51:26PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
>
> > As KS and OLS are over, here's a status update on what patches and/or what
> > issues (in the world outside of KS and OLS) are at what state at the moment.
> > Also, I'm looking forward to read Paul's paper in the OLS proceedings, and
> > to see what Dave has added to his TODO list :)
>
> I fly back today (should have been last night, but thats a long
> story for another time), and expect to spend a few days doing
> nothing work related at all when I get back 8-)
Enjoy that time!
> Notes I scribbled in my TODO during OLS include..
> - check permissons on cpufreq sysfs files
> Someone mentioned that have these root r-- is a bit
> pointless as they aren't really security sensitive.
-r-------- 1 root root 4096 28. Jul 18:43 cpuinfo_cur_freq
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 28. Jul 18:43 cpuinfo_max_freq
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 28. Jul 18:43 cpuinfo_min_freq
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 28. Jul 18:43 scaling_available_frequencies
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 28. Jul 18:43 scaling_available_governors
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 28. Jul 18:43 scaling_cur_freq
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 28. Jul 18:43 scaling_driver
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 28. Jul 18:43 scaling_governor
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 28. Jul 18:43 scaling_max_freq
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 28. Jul 18:43 scaling_min_freq
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4096 28. Jul 18:43 scaling_setspeed
The only file r-- is "cpuinfo_cur_freq", and that may involve calls to
hardware which may take a bit of time... so it's less a security issue, but
a "local DoS" issue because the system might get unresponsive [though I'd
doubt any current cpufreq driver actually might be "exploitable" this
way...]
> Thanks for scooping up the patches, I'll take a look at merging
> them a few days after I get back, possibly the weekend, Monday
> at the latest.
Thanks,
Dominik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-28 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-27 20:51 post-OLS pending cpufreq patches Dominik Brodowski
2004-07-28 13:59 ` Dave Jones
2004-07-28 17:25 ` Dominik Brodowski [this message]
2004-08-02 19:33 ` Dave Jones
2004-08-02 20:40 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-08-02 20:42 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-08-02 20:52 ` Dave Jones
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-02 22:45 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2004-08-03 12:42 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-08-03 13:17 ` Dave Jones
2004-08-03 13:30 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-08-03 13:37 ` Dave Jones
2004-08-03 14:07 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-08-03 14:19 ` Dave Jones
2004-08-03 15:06 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040728172529.GC8678@dominikbrodowski.de \
--to=linux@dominikbrodowski.de \
--cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.