From: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@yahoo.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add PCI ROMs to sysfs
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:53:25 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040730215325.98365.qmail@web14922.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040730212930.GA30979@kroah.com>
Here's another grungy thing I needed to do to PCI. Multi-headed video
cards don't really implement independent PCI devices even though they
look like independent devices. I've heard that this behavior is needed
for MS Windows compatibility.
I'm missing a PCI call to claim ownership for the secondary device
without also causing a second instance of my driver to be loaded.
Here's the code I'm using, what's the right way to do this?
struct pci_dev *secondary;
/* check the next function on the same card */
secondary = pci_find_slot(dev->pdev->bus->number, dev->pdev->devfn +
1);
if (secondary) {
/* check if class is secondary video */
if (secondary->class == 0x038000) {
DRM_DEBUG("registering secondary video head\n");
/* This code is need to bind the driver to the secondary device */
/* There is no direct pci call to do this, there should be one */
secondary->dev.driver = dev->pdev->dev.driver;
device_bind_driver(&secondary->dev);
/* dev->pdev->driver is not filled until after probe completes */
secondary->driver = to_pci_driver(dev->pdev->dev.driver);
pci_dev_get(secondary);
}
}
=====
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@yahoo.com
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-30 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 110+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-30 21:09 [PATCH] add PCI ROMs to sysfs Jesse Barnes
2004-07-30 21:29 ` Greg KH
2004-07-30 21:34 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-07-30 21:39 ` Greg KH
2004-07-30 21:48 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-07-30 22:15 ` Jon Smirl
2004-07-31 15:59 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-02 17:02 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-02 17:29 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-02 21:00 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-02 21:05 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-02 23:32 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-02 23:30 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-03 2:03 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-03 2:32 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-03 17:07 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-03 21:19 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-03 21:28 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-03 21:30 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-03 21:31 ` Martin Mares
2004-08-03 21:36 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-03 21:39 ` Martin Mares
2004-08-04 6:00 ` lspci and ROM on bridge, was: " Jon Smirl
2004-08-04 16:04 ` Martin Mares
2004-08-05 5:05 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-05 5:41 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-08-05 11:53 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-05 15:54 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-05 16:25 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-05 20:45 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-05 21:12 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-06 21:14 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-06 22:33 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-11 17:04 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-11 17:28 ` Greg KH
2004-08-11 18:02 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-11 18:12 ` Greg KH
2004-08-12 1:28 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-08-12 14:38 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-12 17:29 ` Greg KH
2004-08-12 2:25 ` Miles Bader
2004-08-12 4:38 ` Greg KH
2004-08-12 9:18 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-08-12 22:01 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-08-11 19:24 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-11 19:44 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-11 20:11 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-11 23:31 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-12 11:51 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-12 20:28 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-12 0:45 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-12 4:37 ` Greg KH
2004-08-04 6:08 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-04 15:56 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-07-30 21:53 ` Jon Smirl [this message]
2004-07-31 10:03 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-07-31 13:28 ` Jon Smirl
2004-07-31 15:42 ` Greg KH
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-04 15:57 Petr Vandrovec
2004-08-04 17:06 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-05 1:38 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-11 23:27 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2004-08-12 0:22 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-12 2:22 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-13 18:17 ` Martin Mares
2004-08-14 5:34 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-14 9:47 ` Martin Mares
2004-08-14 14:17 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-14 22:10 ` Martin Mares
2004-08-14 23:39 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-18 18:13 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-18 18:37 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-08-23 22:51 ` Greg KH
2004-08-25 17:32 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-25 17:42 ` Greg KH
2004-08-25 18:06 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-25 18:19 ` Greg KH
2004-08-25 18:45 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-25 18:55 ` Greg KH
2004-08-25 20:06 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-26 13:13 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-08-26 15:40 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-26 15:58 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-08-26 19:54 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-28 16:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-08-28 17:33 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-28 17:38 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-27 16:43 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-08-27 22:29 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-28 16:35 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-08-28 21:53 ` Grant Grundler
2004-08-25 18:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-08-19 12:51 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-19 23:00 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-19 14:01 ` Martin Mares
2004-08-19 23:11 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-20 10:26 ` Martin Mares
2004-08-25 15:36 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-08-25 15:50 ` Jon Smirl
2004-08-12 8:39 Thomas Winischhofer
2004-08-29 4:58 Jon Smirl
2004-09-03 1:40 Jon Smirl
2004-09-03 17:27 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-03 17:45 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-03 18:06 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-08 3:15 Jon Smirl
2004-09-08 6:07 ` Greg KH
2004-09-08 23:50 ` Greg KH
2004-10-08 2:20 ` Jon Smirl
2004-11-05 23:06 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040730215325.98365.qmail@web14922.mail.yahoo.com \
--to=jonsmirl@yahoo.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jbarnes@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.