[uml-devel] Re: Incremental patches available

[uml-devel] Re: Incremental patches available

[Allen Chan]

While attempting to build and test a 2.6.7 kernel including the 
patches found on the new incremental patches page, I've bumped into 
into problems with a couple of the patches:

(1)  remap - apparently, this patch has already been applied as part 
of  uml-patch-2.6.7-1.bz2.
(2)  time - one of the patches included here attempts to modify 
um/arch/um/os/Makefile.  However, that file does not exist.  It looks 
like that file should be um/arch/um/os-Linux/Makefile.

The rest of the 2.6.7 patches (other than hostfs which the website 
says "*** This currently doesn't compile ***") appear to apply with 
no problems.

Now to compile and beat up on the new test kernel...


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on
Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now,
one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology
Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Re: [uml-devel] Re: Incremental patches available

[Jeff Dike]

On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 07:24:02PM -0400, Allen Chan wrote:
> While attempting to build and test a 2.6.7 kernel including the 
> patches found on the new incremental patches page, I've bumped into 
> into problems with a couple of the patches:
> 
> (1)  remap - apparently, this patch has already been applied as part 
> of  uml-patch-2.6.7-1.bz2.

Yeah, I released 2.6.7 from after the remap patch.

> (2)  time - one of the patches included here attempts to modify 
> um/arch/um/os/Makefile.  However, that file does not exist.  It looks 
> like that file should be um/arch/um/os-Linux/Makefile.

Oops, /me will fix.  I didn't notice that because I'm playing with a built
pool which has the symlinks there.  I was trying to make sure I got these
right, but I missed that.

> Now to compile and beat up on the new test kernel...

Excellent, that's a big reason I did this.

				Jeff


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on
Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now,
one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology
Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Re: [uml-devel] Re: Incremental patches available

[Allen Chan]

The multple-includes patch for 2.4.26-2um has the same issue for the 
file um/arch/um/os/drivers/ethertap_kern.c file.

On Saturday 31 July 2004 01:02 am, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > (2)  time - one of the patches included here attempts to modify
> > um/arch/um/os/Makefile.  However, that file does not exist.  It
> > looks like that file should be um/arch/um/os-Linux/Makefile.
>
> Oops, /me will fix.  I didn't notice that because I'm playing with
> a built pool which has the symlinks there.  I was trying to make
> sure I got these right, but I missed that.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on
Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now,
one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology
Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel