From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Rick Lindsley <ricklind@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
kernel@kolivas.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.8-rc2-mm2 performance improvements (scheduler?)
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 12:45:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040805104537.GA20466@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200408050520.i755K6503436@owlet.beaverton.ibm.com>
* Rick Lindsley <ricklind@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> Okay, they're done. Here's the URL of the graphs:
>
> http://eaglet.rain.com/rick/linux/staircase/scase-vs-noscase.html
>
> General summary: as Martin reported, we're seeing improvements in a
> number of areas, at least with sdet. The graphs as listed there
> represent stats from four separate sdet runs run sequentially with an
> increasing load. (We're trying to see if we can get the information
> from each run separately, rather than the aggregate -- one of the
> hazards of an automated test harness :)
really nice results! Would be interesting to see the effect of Con's
patch on other SMP/NUMA workloads as well - i'd expect to see an
improvement there too. The test was done with the default interactive=1
compute=0 setting, right?
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-05 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-04 15:10 2.6.8-rc2-mm2 performance improvements (scheduler?) Martin J. Bligh
2004-08-04 15:12 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-08-04 19:24 ` Andrew Morton
2004-08-04 19:34 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-08-04 19:50 ` Andrew Morton
2004-08-04 20:07 ` Rick Lindsley
2004-08-04 20:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-04 20:36 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-08-04 21:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-04 23:34 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-08-04 21:26 ` 2.6.8-rc2-mm2, schedstat-2.6.8-rc2-mm2-A4.patch Ingo Molnar
2004-08-04 21:34 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-08-04 21:46 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-08-04 22:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-04 22:10 ` Rick Lindsley
[not found] ` <20040805143249.GA23967@elte.hu>
2004-08-05 18:36 ` Andrew Morton
2004-08-05 18:59 ` Rick Lindsley
2004-08-04 23:44 ` 2.6.8-rc2-mm2 performance improvements (scheduler?) Peter Williams
2004-08-04 23:59 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-08-05 5:20 ` Rick Lindsley
2004-08-05 10:45 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
[not found] <200408092240.05287.habanero@us.ibm.com>
2004-08-10 4:08 ` Andrew Theurer
2004-08-10 4:37 ` Con Kolivas
2004-08-10 15:05 ` Andrew Theurer
2004-08-10 20:57 ` Con Kolivas
2004-08-10 7:40 ` Rick Lindsley
2004-08-10 15:19 ` Andrew Theurer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040805104537.GA20466@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
--cc=ricklind@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.