All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Porter <mporter@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Ralph Siemsen <rsiemsen@rossvideo.com>
Cc: Linux PPC Dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>,
	Matt Porter <mporter@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 44x ethernet MDIO access
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 14:34:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040805143449.D14159@home.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41129315.600@rossvideo.com>; from rsiemsen@rossvideo.com on Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 04:05:41PM -0400


On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 04:05:41PM -0400, Ralph Siemsen wrote:
> Ralph Siemsen wrote:
> > In a related issue, both the PHY read and write functions use a fixed
> > time delay (MDIO_DELAY = 50) presently... it seems I need a longer value
> > on my hardware, and having such hardcoded values is trouble anyways... I
> > suggest we change the code to poll for completion, with a short delay
> > and an upper limit on the number of loops.
>
> I've just checked the hardware, it seems that the MDIO clock is driven
> at EPB clock divided by 10.  So on the IBM eval board its 7.6MHz.  Each
> MDIO transfer involves moving 64 bits of data.  So that means just the
> data transfer (never mind any processing in the PHY) takes 8.4us.
>
> The important part to note is that EPB could vary over a considerable
> range, so the time needed for MDIO is potentially longer than the 50us
> currently used in the code.
>
> Attached is a patch that "works for me" - turns the long udelay() into a
> polling loop with short little delays instead.  This allows MDIO_DELAY
> to be increased to a larger value (say 150) without slowing down most
> systems.
>
> Also I can be used to measure just how long the transfers actually take.
>   If MDIO_DEBUG is enabled then you'll see how many "loops" were
> needed... on the Ocotea board i get values around 25.
>
> -Ralph

Applied (with minor mods).

Ralph, can you take a look at http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/3180
and sign off your future patches accordingly?

Thanks,
Matt


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-05 21:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-05 19:01 [PATCH] 44x ethernet MDIO access Ralph Siemsen
2004-08-05 20:05 ` Ralph Siemsen
2004-08-05 21:34   ` Matt Porter [this message]
2004-08-06 12:12   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-08-06 13:04     ` Ralph Siemsen
2004-08-05 21:23 ` Matt Porter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040805143449.D14159@home.com \
    --to=mporter@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=rsiemsen@rossvideo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.