From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sf.net>
Cc: linux-kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@vger.kernel.org, rl@hellgate.ch
Subject: Re: [proc.txt] Fix /proc/pid/statm documentation
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 20:48:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040806034859.GQ17188@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1091754711.1231.2388.camel@cube>
Roger Luethi writes:
>> I really wanted /proc/pid/statm to die [1] and I still believe the
>> reasoning is valid. As it doesn't look like that is going to happen,
On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 09:11:52PM -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> It would be awful to lose statm, especially since WLI has fixes
> for some of the problems. Just why do you want to kill statm?
> Now quoting from your patch...
Just to cite my own sources, the fixes I had were forward ports of RHAS
patches for statm accounting at the time of pte modification.
-- wli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-06 3:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-06 1:11 [proc.txt] Fix /proc/pid/statm documentation Albert Cahalan
2004-08-06 3:48 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2004-08-06 9:40 ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-06 10:46 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-06 12:01 ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-06 12:01 ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-06 12:11 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-06 12:11 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-06 13:57 ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-06 13:57 ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-06 14:07 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-06 14:07 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-06 15:02 ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-06 15:02 ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-06 14:02 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-06 14:02 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-06 16:48 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-06 17:08 ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-06 17:08 ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-06 15:14 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-06 15:14 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-06 20:49 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-08-06 20:49 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-08-06 18:38 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-06 18:38 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-06 21:15 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-08-06 21:15 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-08-07 17:37 ` Paul Jackson
2004-08-07 17:37 ` Paul Jackson
2004-08-06 12:58 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-06 12:58 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-06 15:48 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-06 15:48 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-06 14:14 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-06 14:14 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-06 16:49 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-06 16:49 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-06 16:34 ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-06 16:34 ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-06 14:51 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-06 14:51 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-08-06 17:28 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-08-06 17:28 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-08-06 18:21 ` Roger Luethi
2004-08-06 18:21 ` Roger Luethi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-05 17:10 Roger Luethi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040806034859.GQ17188@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=albert@users.sf.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rl@hellgate.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.