* Re: sun4d SMP?
@ 2004-08-07 12:03 Adam Hunt
2004-08-07 23:54 ` William Lee Irwin III
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Adam Hunt @ 2004-08-07 12:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sparclinux
I heard that headway had been made on SMP support for the sun4d. Is
that true? I found someone with a quad 85MHz 1000E locally and I
would really like to add it to my network but if I am only going to
get one proc up it isn't really worth it.
--adam
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: sun4d SMP?
2004-08-07 12:03 sun4d SMP? Adam Hunt
@ 2004-08-07 23:54 ` William Lee Irwin III
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: William Lee Irwin III @ 2004-08-07 23:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sparclinux
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 05:03:25AM -0700, Adam Hunt wrote:
> I heard that headway had been made on SMP support for the sun4d. Is
> that true? I found someone with a quad 85MHz 1000E locally and I
> would really like to add it to my network but if I am only going to
> get one proc up it isn't really worth it.
Not directly, no. I committed minimalistic changes to get the stuff to
compile. This was so that viro could do sparse work on the relevant
arch code. sun4d work will begin in earnest when I get hardware access
(which is planned to happen, just a month or two off).
-- wli
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-08-07 23:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-08-07 12:03 sun4d SMP? Adam Hunt
2004-08-07 23:54 ` William Lee Irwin III
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.