From: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
To: davidm@hpl.hp.com
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>, James Morris <jmorris@redhat.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@epoch.ncsc.mil>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [LSM] Rework LSM hooks
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 11:16:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040811111609.H1924@build.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16666.24955.224034.291755@napali.hpl.hp.com>; from davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com on Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 11:12:11AM -0700
* David Mosberger (davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com) wrote:
> The macro I had in mind works only for static (compile-time)
> predictions, I'm afraid.
Ah, shoot. Well, I don't like the penalty from the unlikely() approach,
so we should keep it as-is unless there's another clever solution lurking.
thanks,
-chris
--
Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-11 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-10 8:57 [PATCH] [LSM] Rework LSM hooks Kurt Garloff
2004-08-10 13:29 ` James Morris
2004-08-10 20:23 ` Chris Wright
2004-08-10 20:27 ` James Morris
2004-08-10 20:43 ` Chris Wright
2004-08-11 1:55 ` James Morris
2004-08-10 14:16 ` James Morris
2004-08-10 15:02 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-10 19:22 ` James Morris
2004-08-10 20:00 ` Chris Wright
2004-08-10 20:07 ` James Morris
2004-08-10 20:12 ` Chris Wright
2004-08-10 20:31 ` James Morris
2004-08-11 8:47 ` David Mosberger
2004-08-11 15:25 ` Chris Wright
2004-08-11 18:12 ` David Mosberger
2004-08-11 18:16 ` Chris Wright [this message]
2004-08-11 22:22 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-08-12 1:23 ` James Morris
2004-08-12 3:58 ` Greg KH
2004-08-12 18:15 ` Chris Wright
2004-08-12 18:17 ` Chris Wright
2004-08-16 14:19 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-08-11 22:19 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-08-12 1:20 ` James Morris
2004-08-12 2:03 ` Kurt Garloff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040811111609.H1924@build.pdx.osdl.net \
--to=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=garloff@suse.de \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jmorris@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sds@epoch.ncsc.mil \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.