From: Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de>
To: James Morris <jmorris@redhat.com>
Cc: Linux kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [LSM] Rework LSM hooks
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 00:19:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040811221903.GA14744@tpkurt.garloff.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Xine.LNX.4.44.0408101006580.7711-100000@dhcp83-76.boston.redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 742 bytes --]
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 10:16:29AM -0400, James Morris wrote:
> Is this just an ia64 issue? If so, then perhaps we should look at only
> penalising ia64? Otherwise, loading an LSM module is going to cause
> expensive false unlikely() on _every_ LSM hook.
You should worry about the fast path.
That's no LSM being loaded and just using the default capabilities.
Which is what most users usse as of this time.
If you do call into any serious LSM, you'll spend much more CPU cycles
anyway ...
Regards,
--
Kurt Garloff <kurt@garloff.de> [Koeln, DE]
Physics:Plasma modeling <garloff@plasimo.phys.tue.nl> [TU Eindhoven, NL]
Linux: SUSE Labs (Head) <garloff@suse.de> [SUSE Nuernberg, DE]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-11 22:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-10 8:57 [PATCH] [LSM] Rework LSM hooks Kurt Garloff
2004-08-10 13:29 ` James Morris
2004-08-10 20:23 ` Chris Wright
2004-08-10 20:27 ` James Morris
2004-08-10 20:43 ` Chris Wright
2004-08-11 1:55 ` James Morris
2004-08-10 14:16 ` James Morris
2004-08-10 15:02 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-10 19:22 ` James Morris
2004-08-10 20:00 ` Chris Wright
2004-08-10 20:07 ` James Morris
2004-08-10 20:12 ` Chris Wright
2004-08-10 20:31 ` James Morris
2004-08-11 8:47 ` David Mosberger
2004-08-11 15:25 ` Chris Wright
2004-08-11 18:12 ` David Mosberger
2004-08-11 18:16 ` Chris Wright
2004-08-11 22:22 ` Kurt Garloff
2004-08-12 1:23 ` James Morris
2004-08-12 3:58 ` Greg KH
2004-08-12 18:15 ` Chris Wright
2004-08-12 18:17 ` Chris Wright
2004-08-16 14:19 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-08-11 22:19 ` Kurt Garloff [this message]
2004-08-12 1:20 ` James Morris
2004-08-12 2:03 ` Kurt Garloff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040811221903.GA14744@tpkurt.garloff.de \
--to=garloff@suse.de \
--cc=jmorris@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.