From: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PATCH: switch ide-proc to use the ide_key functionality
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 21:05:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040817010533.GB32628@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200408170231.25725.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl>
BTW this may help if I document the locks and what they cover in case its
not obvious
drives_lock is the spin lock you must own to update the drive list
ide_cfg_sem is the semaphore you must own to walk or hold loose references
to the ide_hwif_t array and elements relating to adding/removing/busy status
ide_lock is taken when you want to write that array and deal with elements
that are interrupt walked by other devices. Notably this means the hwgroup
chains.
ide_settings_sem could be per drive but isnt, it is used when you are
processing the ioctl/proc objects attached to the driver either by walking
them or removing them.
drivers_lock is the spin lock you must own to update the drivers list
drivers_sem is the semaphore you must own to walk the list and while
holding loose references to drivers (ie when the busy/lists are not
consistent)
The lock order is
ide_cfg_sem
drivers_sem
ide_settings_sem
drivers_lock | drives_lock
ide_lock
Which means my cunning plan from the previous mail doesn't actually work
unless we take ide_cfg_sem at the top of the proc code before setting_sem.
Also looking over it I need to send you the bits to take the sems in each
proc routine for that case.
PS: what do you think about deprecating (but not yet removing) ide_write_config
and ide_read_config now we have sysfs ? Does anyone actually use its
"wait for non busy and then pci config write" - does anyone use it at all ?
Also while looking at proc it would clean up read_imodel and make it a ton
more useful to stick the string pointers into hwif->chipset_name or somesuch
so we can report the PCI ones in detail ?
Alan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-17 1:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-15 15:04 PATCH: switch ide-proc to use the ide_key functionality Alan Cox
2004-08-16 15:24 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-08-16 15:30 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-16 23:22 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-08-16 23:35 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-08-17 0:13 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-17 0:31 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-08-17 0:41 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-17 1:05 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2004-08-17 10:48 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-08-17 12:06 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-17 22:15 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040817010533.GB32628@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
--to=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.