lkml problem

lkml problem

[Denis Vlasenko]

Hi Matti,

Can you check why do my mails stopped appearing on
lkml lately? My SMTP server reports them as accepted:

info msg 192270: bytes 23472 from <vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> qp 21977 uid 80
starting delivery 440: msg 192270 to remote arjanv@redhat.com
starting delivery 441: msg 192270 to remote Jens.Maurer@gmx.net
starting delivery 442: msg 192270 to remote linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
delivery 442: success: 12.107.209.244_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_2.7.0_nothing_apparently_wrong_i
delivery 440: success: 66.187.233.31_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_2.0.0_i7HHVve1030758_Message_acce
delivery 441: success: 213.165.64.100_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_2.6.0_{mx028}_Message_accepted/

My SMTP server's IP is 195.66.192.168
--
vda

Re: lkml problem

[Gene Heskett]

On Tuesday 17 August 2004 15:56, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
>Hi Matti,
>
>Can you check why do my mails stopped appearing on
>lkml lately? My SMTP server reports them as accepted:
>
>info msg 192270: bytes 23472 from
> <vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> qp 21977 uid 80 starting
> delivery 440: msg 192270 to remote arjanv@redhat.com starting
> delivery 441: msg 192270 to remote Jens.Maurer@gmx.net starting
> delivery 442: msg 192270 to remote linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> delivery 442: success:
> 12.107.209.244_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_2.7.0_nothin
>g_apparently_wrong_i delivery 440: success:
> 66.187.233.31_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_2.0.0_i7HHVve
>1030758_Message_acce delivery 441: success:
> 213.165.64.100_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_2.6.0_{mx028
>}_Message_accepted/
>
>My SMTP server's IP is 195.66.192.168
>--
>vda
>
My filters caught the CC: line and stuffed it to lkml as usual Denis.

>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
99.24% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attorneys please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2004 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.

Re: lkml problem

[Gene Heskett]

On Wednesday 18 August 2004 01:48, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
>> >Can you check why do my mails stopped appearing on
>> >lkml lately? My SMTP server reports them as accepted:
>> >
>> >info msg 192270: bytes 23472 from
>> > <vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> qp 21977 uid 80 starting
>> > delivery 440: msg 192270 to remote arjanv@redhat.com starting
>> > delivery 441: msg 192270 to remote Jens.Maurer@gmx.net starting
>> > delivery 442: msg 192270 to remote linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> > delivery 442: success:
>> > 12.107.209.244_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_2.7.0_not
>> >hin g_apparently_wrong_i delivery 440: success:
>> > 66.187.233.31_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_2.0.0_i7HH
>> >Vve 1030758_Message_acce delivery 441: success:
>> > 213.165.64.100_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_2.6.0_{mx
>> >028 }_Message_accepted/
>> >
>> >My SMTP server's IP is 195.66.192.168
>> >--
>> >vda
>>
>> My filters caught the CC: line and stuffed it to lkml as usual
>> Denis.
>
>Yes. However, I sent a patch thrice (twice before and once after
>the message to Matti) and I don't see that patch posted.
>I checked www.lkml.org.

I noted that in a couple of reject messages the server has posted (and 
I don't recall if it came from you, normally they are from some 
obviously spammish src) that there is a list of attachement ".ext" 
specifiers that they will /dev/null.  There have been 2 of those just 
this morning, but they get the big red X treatment here (kmail) 
before they get lost in the other 10,000 plus messages of this list.

Does the reverse dns lookup work as expected?  I think thats another 
reason, but since the text msgs are coming ok, I drift off in the 
direction of the attachements extension as the reason.  This list 
seems to be in favor of inlining any patches which removes that 
aspect of the filtering done.

>--
>vda

-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
99.24% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
Yahoo.com attorneys please note, additions to this message
by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2004 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.

Re: lkml problem

[Tonnerre]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 311 bytes --]

Salut,

On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 07:47:09AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> This list seems to be in favor of inlining any patches which removes
> that aspect of the filtering done.

Not  exactly: It's  rather that  small  patches get  inlined and  huge
patches attached. (At least according to specs)

			Tonnerre

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]