All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <spaminos-ker@yahoo.com>
To: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Scheduler fairness problem on 2.6 series (Attn: Nick Piggin and others)
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 14:11:41 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040824211141.13585.qmail@web13921.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41229ED8.3050304@bigpond.net.au>

--- Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au> wrote:

> Could you try it in "pb" mode with both max_ia_bonus and max_tpt_bonus 
> set to zero?  That will disable all "priority" fiddling and tasks should 
> just round robin at a priority determined solely by their "nice" value 
> and since (according to your earlier mail) all the daemons have the same 
> "nice" value they should just round robin with each other.


Hi, I tried the latest  V-5.0 patch over 2.6.8.1 in these conditions with the
actual server subsystem, and I get components timeouts :(
I also ran the watchdog script on the box while running the test, and saw
deltas of around 3 seconds every few hours:

Tue Aug 24 03:02:13 PDT 2004
>>>>>>> delta = 3
Tue Aug 24 05:50:14 PDT 2004
>>>>>>> delta = 3
Tue Aug 24 09:05:24 PDT 2004
>>>>>>> delta = 4
Tue Aug 24 09:06:20 PDT 2004
>>>>>>> delta = 4
Tue Aug 24 09:36:22 PDT 2004
>>>>>>> delta = 3
Tue Aug 24 10:20:16 PDT 2004
>>>>>>> delta = 3
Tue Aug 24 13:28:19 PDT 2004
>>>>>>> delta = 3

Could I do something more useful than just displaying those deltas? Maybe I
could dump the process list in some way, or enable some debugging code in the
kernel to find out what is going on?

Thanks

Nicolas

=====
------------------------------------------------------------
video meliora proboque deteriora sequor
------------------------------------------------------------

  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-24 21:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <411D50AE.5020005@bigpond.net.au>
2004-08-17 23:19 ` Scheduler fairness problem on 2.6 series (Attn: Nick Piggin and others) spaminos-ker
2004-08-18  0:12   ` Peter Williams
2004-08-24 21:11     ` spaminos-ker [this message]
2004-08-24 23:04       ` Peter Williams
2004-08-24 23:22         ` Lee Revell
2004-08-26  2:30         ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-26  2:42           ` Peter Williams
2004-08-26  8:39             ` Peter Williams
2004-08-28  1:59               ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-29  0:21                 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-29  0:25                   ` Lee Revell
2004-08-29  0:45                     ` Lee Revell
2004-08-29  2:03                       ` Peter Williams
2004-08-29  2:28                         ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-29  4:53                           ` Peter Williams
2004-08-29  1:19                     ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-29  1:22                       ` Lee Revell
2004-08-29  1:31                         ` Peter Williams
2004-09-13 20:09                           ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-29  2:20                       ` Lee Revell
     [not found] <20040811093945.GA10667@elte.hu>
2004-08-17 23:08 ` spaminos-ker
     [not found] <20040811010116.GL11200@holomorphy.com>
2004-08-11  2:21 ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-11  2:23   ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-11  2:45     ` Peter Williams
2004-08-11  2:47       ` Peter Williams
2004-08-11  3:23         ` Peter Williams
2004-08-11  3:31           ` Con Kolivas
2004-08-11  3:46             ` Peter Williams
2004-08-11  3:44           ` Peter Williams
2004-08-13  0:13             ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-13  1:44               ` Peter Williams
2004-08-11  3:09   ` Con Kolivas
2004-08-11 10:24     ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-08-12  2:04     ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-12  2:24     ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-12  2:53       ` Con Kolivas
2004-08-07 21:53 spaminos-ker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040824211141.13585.qmail@web13921.mail.yahoo.com \
    --to=spaminos-ker@yahoo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.