All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <spaminos-ker@yahoo.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>,
	William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
Subject: Re: Scheduler fairness problem on 2.6 series (Attn: Nick Piggin and others)
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 17:13:04 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040813001304.59753.qmail@web13912.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4119960A.4010002@bigpond.net.au>


--- Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> I've just run your tests on my desktop and with max_ia_bonus at its 
> default value I see the "delta = 3" with 20 threads BUT when I set 
> max_ia_bonus to zero they stop (in both "eb" and "pb" mode).  So I then 
> reran the tests with 60 threads and zero max_ia_bonus and no output was 
> generated by your testdelay script in either "eb" or "pb" modes.  I 
> didn't try "sc" mode as I have a ZAPHOD kernel loaded (not HYDRA) but 
> Con has reported that the problem is absent in his latest patches so 
> I'll update the "sc" mode in HYDRA to those patches.
> 

I just tried the same test on spa-zaphod-linux 4.1 over 2.6.8-rc4

I also have messages with 20 threads "delta = 3" that go away when I set
max_ia_bonus to 0 (and stay off with 60 threads too) in "pb" mode.
But, unlike your desktop, the "eb" mode doesn't seem to get better by setting
max_ia_bonus to 0 on my machine, maybe I need to tweak something else? (even
though, the idea of tweaking for a given workload doesn't sound very good to
me).

The "pb" mode is very responsive with the system under heavy load, I like it :)

I will run some tests over the week end with the actual server to see the
effect of this patch on a more complex system.

Nicolas

PS: the machine I am using is a pure server, only accessible through ssh, so I
can not really tell the behavior under X.


  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-13  0:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20040811010116.GL11200@holomorphy.com>
2004-08-11  2:21 ` Scheduler fairness problem on 2.6 series (Attn: Nick Piggin and others) spaminos-ker
2004-08-11  2:23   ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-11  2:45     ` Peter Williams
2004-08-11  2:47       ` Peter Williams
2004-08-11  3:23         ` Peter Williams
2004-08-11  3:31           ` Con Kolivas
2004-08-11  3:46             ` Peter Williams
2004-08-11  3:44           ` Peter Williams
2004-08-13  0:13             ` spaminos-ker [this message]
2004-08-13  1:44               ` Peter Williams
2004-08-11  3:09   ` Con Kolivas
2004-08-11 10:24     ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-08-11 11:26       ` Scheduler fairness problem on 2.6 series Con Kolivas
2004-08-11 12:05         ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-08-11 19:22           ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-08-11 23:42             ` Con Kolivas
2004-08-12  8:08               ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-08-12 18:18               ` Bill Davidsen
2004-08-12  2:04     ` Scheduler fairness problem on 2.6 series (Attn: Nick Piggin and others) spaminos-ker
2004-08-12  2:24     ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-12  2:53       ` Con Kolivas
     [not found] <411D50AE.5020005@bigpond.net.au>
2004-08-17 23:19 ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-18  0:12   ` Peter Williams
2004-08-24 21:11     ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-24 23:04       ` Peter Williams
2004-08-24 23:22         ` Lee Revell
2004-08-26  2:30         ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-26  2:42           ` Peter Williams
2004-08-26  8:39             ` Peter Williams
2004-08-28  1:59               ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-29  0:21                 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-29  0:25                   ` Lee Revell
2004-08-29  0:45                     ` Lee Revell
2004-08-29  2:03                       ` Peter Williams
2004-08-29  2:28                         ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-29  4:53                           ` Peter Williams
2004-08-29  1:19                     ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-29  1:22                       ` Lee Revell
2004-08-29  1:31                         ` Peter Williams
2004-09-13 20:09                           ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-29  2:20                       ` Lee Revell
     [not found] <20040811093945.GA10667@elte.hu>
2004-08-17 23:08 ` spaminos-ker
2004-08-07 21:53 spaminos-ker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040813001304.59753.qmail@web13912.mail.yahoo.com \
    --to=spaminos-ker@yahoo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
    --cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.