All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>
To: Thomas Zehetbauer <thomasz@hostmaster.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: netfilter IPv6 support
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 00:05:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040826220501.GA564@alpha.home.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1093555510.3497.33.camel@hostmaster.org>

On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 11:25:10PM +0200, Thomas Zehetbauer wrote:
> On Don, 2004-08-26 at 13:00 -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> > Stateful netfilter is not there because it's a total waste
> > to completely duplicate all of the connection tracking et al.
> > code into ipv6 counterparts when %80 of the code is roughly
> > the same.  People are working on a consolidation of these
> > things so that there is no code duplication but it is a lot
> > of work and there are bigger fires to put out at the moment.
> 
> Of course it's a waste to duplicate the code but as far as I remember
> the status of netfilter for IPv6 has not changed for almost a year. As
> said there is still not even the basic REJECT target available.

These features are available in patch-o-matic-ng. They're not in mainline
because the netfilter team only pushes well tested and non-intrusive changes.
But there are lots of people using features from patch-o-matic in production.
You can get those here :

    ftp://ftp.netfilter.org/pub/patch-o-matic-ng/

Please also take a look at the mailing list archives since it's an area
which is currently moving :
 
    http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=netfilter-devel

Regards,
Willy

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>
To: Thomas Zehetbauer <thomasz@hostmaster.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: netfilter IPv6 support
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 00:05:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040826220501.GA564@alpha.home.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1093555510.3497.33.camel@hostmaster.org>

On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 11:25:10PM +0200, Thomas Zehetbauer wrote:
> On Don, 2004-08-26 at 13:00 -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> > Stateful netfilter is not there because it's a total waste
> > to completely duplicate all of the connection tracking et al.
> > code into ipv6 counterparts when %80 of the code is roughly
> > the same.  People are working on a consolidation of these
> > things so that there is no code duplication but it is a lot
> > of work and there are bigger fires to put out at the moment.
> 
> Of course it's a waste to duplicate the code but as far as I remember
> the status of netfilter for IPv6 has not changed for almost a year. As
> said there is still not even the basic REJECT target available.

These features are available in patch-o-matic-ng. They're not in mainline
because the netfilter team only pushes well tested and non-intrusive changes.
But there are lots of people using features from patch-o-matic in production.
You can get those here :

    ftp://ftp.netfilter.org/pub/patch-o-matic-ng/

Please also take a look at the mailing list archives since it's an area
which is currently moving :
 
    http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=netfilter-devel

Regards,
Willy


  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-26 22:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-26 18:52 netfilter IPv6 support Thomas Zehetbauer
2004-08-26 20:00 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-26 20:00   ` David S. Miller
2004-08-26 21:25   ` Thomas Zehetbauer
2004-08-26 22:05     ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2004-08-26 22:05       ` Willy Tarreau
2004-08-27 10:02       ` Thomas Zehetbauer
2004-08-26 20:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-08-26 21:06   ` David S. Miller
2004-08-26 21:11     ` Jeff Garzik
2004-08-27 10:02       ` Thomas Zehetbauer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040826220501.GA564@alpha.home.local \
    --to=willy@w.ods.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
    --cc=thomasz@hostmaster.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.