From: Tomasz Paszkowski <tomasz.paszkowski@e-wro.pl>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Large number of HTB classes
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 11:40:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040827114049.GA22016@krezus.e-wro.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <412EF503.4010908@parknet.dk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1043 bytes --]
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 12:22:13PM +0200, Simon Lodal wrote:
>
> HFSC seems interesting, but does it really work well? I am not afraid of
> new stuff, but bleeding edge is probably too risky.
I'am running HFSC for network with 4,5k users, handling about 100Mb/s internet
traffic with 25kpacket/s without any problems.
>
> That HTB problem, I guess you mean it is possible to have available
> bandwidth, but when some of it has been distributed between users, all
> users' ceils go below their quantums?
no
>
> But that implies that users have low ceils? Wouldn't it be solved by
> setting all users' ceil to the full link bandwidth?
ceil is set to the full link bandwidth. I dosen't help.
>
> The doubly linked list patch you mention, I believe it should be in
> vanilla kernel since 2.4.20-22 or something? I use 2.4.27 here. If not,
> do you have a link for it?
http://oss.sgi.com/projects/netdev/archive/2004-08/msg00348.html
Consider also using rbtree HFSC patches.
--
Tomasz Paszkowski
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-27 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-27 8:46 [LARTC] Large number of HTB classes Simon Lodal
2004-08-27 9:11 ` Tomasz Paszkowski
2004-08-27 9:16 ` Rio Martin.
2004-08-27 10:22 ` Simon Lodal
2004-08-27 11:40 ` Tomasz Paszkowski [this message]
2004-08-27 13:53 ` Simon Lodal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040827114049.GA22016@krezus.e-wro.net \
--to=tomasz.paszkowski@e-wro.pl \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.