From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: dlstevens@us.ibm.com, davem@redhat.com, laforge@netfilter.org,
netdev@oss.sgi.com, netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com,
netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, okir@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent crash on ip_conntrack removal
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 16:38:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040829163821.2a4239df.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4132516E.7080805@trash.net>
On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 23:58:06 +0200
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> wrote:
> Before I post the patch, 2.4 seems to be
> missing this patch, do you already have it queued or should I send
> a 2.4 version first ?
>
> ChangeSet@1.1853, 2004-08-18 14:28:05-07:00, davem@nuts.davemloft.net
> [IPV4]: Fix theoretical loop on SMP in ip_evictor().
I pushed this off to Marcelo, he just didn't pull from my
tree yet, which is at:
bk://kernel.bkbits.net/davem/net-2.4
Where you'll find those fixes as:
ChangeSet@1.1498.1.2, 2004-08-18 14:26:09-07:00, davem@nuts.davemloft.net
[IPV4]: Fix theoretical loop on SMP in ip_evictor().
Snapshot the amount of work to do, and just do it.
In this way we avoid a theoretical loop whereby
one cpu sits in ip_evictor() tossing fragments
while another keeps adding a fragment just as we
bring ip_frag_mem down below the low threshold.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@redhat.com>
ChangeSet@1.1498.1.3, 2004-08-18 14:31:35-07:00, davem@nuts.davemloft.net
[IPV6]: ip6_evictor() has same problem as ip_evictor().
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-29 23:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-18 9:13 [PATCH] Prevent crash on ip_conntrack removal Olaf Kirch
2004-08-19 10:11 ` Harald Welte
2004-08-19 14:18 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-19 14:55 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-08-19 15:14 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-21 15:10 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-08-22 5:13 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-22 12:58 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-08-23 5:03 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-23 21:18 ` David Stevens
2004-08-24 0:45 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2004-08-24 0:45 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-08-24 21:28 ` David Stevens
2004-08-29 6:15 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-29 19:36 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-08-29 19:57 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-29 20:06 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-08-29 21:58 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-08-29 23:38 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2004-08-30 0:50 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-08-30 4:28 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-29 21:48 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-08-30 7:57 ` Olaf Kirch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040829163821.2a4239df.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=dlstevens@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=laforge@netfilter.org \
--cc=netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=okir@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.