From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
David Stevens <dlstevens@us.ibm.com>,
davem@redhat.com, laforge@netfilter.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com,
netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org,
okir@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent crash on ip_conntrack removal
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 23:48:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41324F2C.4090003@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4132303C.2060807@trash.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1373 bytes --]
Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Attached. The first patch still crashed, we need to prevent new
> fragments from getting queued after the queue is flushed until the
> hook in unregistered.
The patch is racy, another CPU could already have passed the check
for ip_ct_no_defrag and queue the packet after __ip_evictor calculated
the work to do, so the packet (or another one) will not get evicted.
This patch on top calls synchronize_net() to prevent this.
>
>@@ -1181,6 +1183,12 @@
> #ifdef CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG
> unsigned int olddebug = skb->nf_debug;
> #endif
>+
>+ if (unlikely(ip_ct_no_defrag)) {
>+ kfree_skb(skb);
>+ return NULL;
>+ }
>+
> if (sk) {
> sock_hold(sk);
> skb_orphan(skb);
>diff -Nru a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_standalone.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_standalone.c
>--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_standalone.c 2004-08-29 20:55:13 +02:00
>+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_standalone.c 2004-08-29 20:55:13 +02:00
>@@ -805,6 +805,12 @@
> cleanup_defraglocalops:
> nf_unregister_hook(&ip_conntrack_defrag_local_out_ops);
> cleanup_defragops:
>+ /* Frag queues may hold fragments with skb->dst == NULL */
>+ ip_ct_no_defrag = 1;
>+ smp_wmb();
>+ local_bh_disable();
>+ ipfrag_flush();
>+ local_bh_enable();
> nf_unregister_hook(&ip_conntrack_defrag_ops);
> cleanup_proc_stat:
> proc_net_remove("ip_conntrack_stat");
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: x --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 875 bytes --]
# This is a BitKeeper generated diff -Nru style patch.
#
# ChangeSet
# 2004/08/29 23:36:17+02:00 kaber@coreworks.de
# [NETFILTER]: Fix race when flushing fragment queue
#
# Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
#
# net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_standalone.c
# 2004/08/29 23:35:54+02:00 kaber@coreworks.de +1 -1
# [NETFILTER]: Fix race when flushing fragment queue
#
diff -Nru a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_standalone.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_standalone.c
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_standalone.c 2004-08-29 23:39:07 +02:00
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_standalone.c 2004-08-29 23:39:07 +02:00
@@ -807,7 +807,7 @@
cleanup_defragops:
/* Frag queues may hold fragments with skb->dst == NULL */
ip_ct_no_defrag = 1;
- smp_wmb();
+ synchronize_net();
local_bh_disable();
ipfrag_flush();
local_bh_enable();
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-29 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-18 9:13 [PATCH] Prevent crash on ip_conntrack removal Olaf Kirch
2004-08-19 10:11 ` Harald Welte
2004-08-19 14:18 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-19 14:55 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-08-19 15:14 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-21 15:10 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-08-22 5:13 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-22 12:58 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-08-23 5:03 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-23 21:18 ` David Stevens
2004-08-24 0:45 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2004-08-24 0:45 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-08-24 21:28 ` David Stevens
2004-08-29 6:15 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-29 19:36 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-08-29 19:57 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-29 20:06 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-08-29 21:58 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-08-29 23:38 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-30 0:50 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-08-30 4:28 ` David S. Miller
2004-08-29 21:48 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2004-08-30 7:57 ` Olaf Kirch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41324F2C.4090003@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=dlstevens@us.ibm.com \
--cc=laforge@netfilter.org \
--cc=netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=okir@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.