From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@redhat.com>
Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>,
Nigel Stephens <nigel@mips.com>,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [patch] MIPS/gcc: Revert removal of DImode shifts for 32-bit targets
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 23:53:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040903065331.GG20559@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87eklnw0g7.fsf@redhat.com>
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 08:51:20PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> int TARGET_SHIFT_TRUNCATION_MASK (enum machine_mode MODE)
...
> Note that, unlike `SHIFT_COUNT_TRUNCATED', this function does
> _not_ apply to general shift rtxes; it applies only to instructions
> that are generated by the named shift patterns.
I'm not particularly thrilled about this notion. I'd much prefer a
target hook that could replace SHIFT_COUNT_TRUNCATED. How often are
the named patterns going to differ from the rtxes anyway?
r~
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-03 6:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-19 15:35 [patch] MIPS/gcc: Revert removal of DImode shifts for 32-bit targets Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-07-19 16:59 ` Richard Sandiford
2004-07-19 17:32 ` [patch] MIPS/gcc: Revert removal of DImode shifts for 32-bittargets David Edelsohn
2004-07-19 17:33 ` [patch] MIPS/gcc: Revert removal of DImode shifts for 32-bit targets Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-07-19 17:37 ` Richard Sandiford
2004-07-19 21:38 ` Richard Henderson
2004-07-23 14:41 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-07-23 20:27 ` Richard Henderson
2004-07-23 21:12 ` Ralf Baechle
2004-07-26 11:56 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-08-02 20:03 ` Nigel Stephens
2004-08-03 5:30 ` Richard Sandiford
2004-08-03 9:22 ` Nigel Stephens
2004-08-03 9:36 ` Richard Sandiford
2004-08-03 9:54 ` Nigel Stephens
2004-08-04 19:57 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-08-04 20:37 ` Nigel Stephens
2004-08-04 20:54 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-08-04 23:39 ` Nigel Stephens
2004-08-07 19:01 ` Richard Sandiford
2004-08-09 22:08 ` Richard Henderson
2004-08-10 5:30 ` Richard Sandiford
2004-08-10 23:20 ` Richard Henderson
2004-08-11 0:24 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-08-11 0:40 ` Paul Brook
2004-08-11 4:32 ` Richard Henderson
2004-08-31 19:51 ` Richard Sandiford
2004-09-03 6:53 ` Richard Henderson [this message]
2004-09-03 7:05 ` Richard Sandiford
2004-09-03 7:08 ` Richard Henderson
2004-09-03 7:11 ` Richard Sandiford
2004-09-03 7:20 ` Richard Henderson
2004-09-03 7:29 ` Richard Sandiford
2004-09-03 20:15 ` Richard Henderson
2004-09-04 8:53 ` Richard Sandiford
2004-09-05 0:03 ` Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040903065331.GG20559@redhat.com \
--to=rth@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
--cc=nigel@mips.com \
--cc=rsandifo@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.