All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nigel Stephens <nigel@mips.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@redhat.com>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>,
	gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [patch] MIPS/gcc: Revert removal of DImode shifts for 32-bit targets
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 21:37:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <411148F0.2040605@mips.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58L.0408042123030.31930@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl>

Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:

> Here are my proposals I've referred to previously.  Instruction counts
>are 9, 9 and 10, respectively, as I've missed an additional instruction
>required to handle shifts by 0 (or actually any multiples of 64). 
>

IMHO handling a shift by zero correctly is important.

>		"not	%1, %3\n\t"
>		"srlv	%1, %L2, %1\n\t"
>		"srl	%1, %1, 1\n\t"
>

Why not the shorter:

>		"neg	%1, %3\n\t"
>		"srlv	%1, %L2, %1\n\t"
>
>  
>

And then in __ashrdi3:

		"andi	%1, %3, 0x20\n\t"
		".set	push\n\t"
		".set	noat\n\t"
		"sra	$1, %M2, 31\n\t"
		"movn	%L0, %M0, %1\n\t"
		"movn	%M0, $1, %1\n\t"
		".set	pop"

Cute, but I think that should be

	"sra	$1, %M0, 31\n\t"

(i.e %M0 not %M2)

Nigel

  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-04 20:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-19 15:35 [patch] MIPS/gcc: Revert removal of DImode shifts for 32-bit targets Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-07-19 16:59 ` Richard Sandiford
2004-07-19 17:32   ` [patch] MIPS/gcc: Revert removal of DImode shifts for 32-bittargets David Edelsohn
2004-07-19 17:33   ` [patch] MIPS/gcc: Revert removal of DImode shifts for 32-bit targets Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-07-19 17:37     ` Richard Sandiford
2004-07-19 21:38     ` Richard Henderson
2004-07-23 14:41       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-07-23 20:27         ` Richard Henderson
2004-07-23 21:12           ` Ralf Baechle
2004-07-26 11:56             ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-08-02 20:03               ` Nigel Stephens
2004-08-03  5:30                 ` Richard Sandiford
2004-08-03  9:22                   ` Nigel Stephens
2004-08-03  9:36                     ` Richard Sandiford
2004-08-03  9:54                       ` Nigel Stephens
2004-08-04 19:57                         ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-08-04 20:37                           ` Nigel Stephens [this message]
2004-08-04 20:54                             ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2004-08-04 23:39                               ` Nigel Stephens
2004-08-07 19:01                           ` Richard Sandiford
2004-08-09 22:08                             ` Richard Henderson
2004-08-10  5:30                               ` Richard Sandiford
2004-08-10 23:20                                 ` Richard Henderson
2004-08-11  0:24                                   ` Andreas Schwab
2004-08-11  0:40                                   ` Paul Brook
2004-08-11  4:32                                     ` Richard Henderson
2004-08-31 19:51                                   ` Richard Sandiford
2004-09-03  6:53                                     ` Richard Henderson
2004-09-03  7:05                                       ` Richard Sandiford
2004-09-03  7:08                                         ` Richard Henderson
2004-09-03  7:11                                           ` Richard Sandiford
2004-09-03  7:20                                             ` Richard Henderson
2004-09-03  7:29                                               ` Richard Sandiford
2004-09-03 20:15                                                 ` Richard Henderson
2004-09-04  8:53                                                   ` Richard Sandiford
2004-09-05  0:03                                                     ` Richard Henderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=411148F0.2040605@mips.com \
    --to=nigel@mips.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=rsandifo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.