From: Duncan Sands <baldrick@free.fr>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netpoll endian fixes
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 12:01:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200409081201.28261.baldrick@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040907235702.GC31237@waste.org>
> It looks like it ought to be 0x45 everywhere, meaning it's currently
> broken everywhere. But no one's complained. Unfortunately at the
> present moment I've got one machine short of a test rig unpacked, so
> I'm loathe to push another fix until I get some other test reports.
Hi Matt, I agree that it should be 0x45 everywhere. After thinking a bit
I concluded that the
#if defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD)
__u8 ihl:4,
version:4;
#elif defined (__BIG_ENDIAN_BITFIELD)
__u8 version:4,
ihl:4;
in the definition of struct iphdr is to make sure that compiler uses the
first four bits of the byte to refer to version, rather than the last four;
and this only matters when you are accessing the nibbles via the ihl
or version structure fields. Thus it makes sure that if you write 0x45
to the byte, then version will return 4 and ihl will return 5. Presumably
the C standard specifies how bitfield expressions should be laid out
in the byte, and ihl:4, version:4; gives opposite results on little-endian
and big-endian machines...
Ciao,
Duncan.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-08 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-07 23:24 [PATCH] netpoll endian fixes Duncan Sands
2004-09-07 23:29 ` Matt Mackall
2004-09-08 6:56 ` Duncan Sands
2004-09-07 23:57 ` Matt Mackall
2004-09-08 10:01 ` Duncan Sands [this message]
2004-09-08 22:53 ` Matt Mackall
2004-09-09 9:31 ` Duncan Sands
[not found] <77423609@toto.iv>
2004-09-09 2:09 ` Peter Chubb
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200409081201.28261.baldrick@free.fr \
--to=baldrick@free.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.