From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
To: BlaisorBlade <blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.7-2
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 20:35:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200409090035.i890ZYBP016288@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 05 Sep 2004 17:35:36 +0200." <200408251746.53523.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>
blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it said:
> * First, please do a "make clean" before releasing the patch. There
> are some binaries included in it! And also semaphore.c, which is a
> symlink normally.
I do. It's just that make clean didn't catch everything.
> * About filehandle_switch: you deleted a line (probably by mistake).
> Reread more carefully the separate patches you get with quilt: when
> you see the other attached patch (uml-restore-lost-code.patch),
> you'll agree with me.
Yuck, I have no idea how that happened.
> However, IMHO, since you cannot close and reopen a pipe, it's
> braindead that the switch_pipe[] array is an array of filehandles.
Yeah, this is fixed in my 2.6 tree now.
Jeff
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
To: BlaisorBlade <blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.7-2
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 20:35:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200409090035.i890ZYBP016288@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 05 Sep 2004 17:35:36 +0200." <200408251746.53523.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>
blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it said:
> * First, please do a "make clean" before releasing the patch. There
> are some binaries included in it! And also semaphore.c, which is a
> symlink normally.
I do. It's just that make clean didn't catch everything.
> * About filehandle_switch: you deleted a line (probably by mistake).
> Reread more carefully the separate patches you get with quilt: when
> you see the other attached patch (uml-restore-lost-code.patch),
> you'll agree with me.
Yuck, I have no idea how that happened.
> However, IMHO, since you cannot close and reopen a pipe, it's
> braindead that the switch_pipe[] array is an array of filehandles.
Yeah, this is fixed in my 2.6 tree now.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-08 23:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-19 3:00 [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.7-2 Jeff Dike
2004-08-19 3:00 ` uml-patch-2.6.7-2 Jeff Dike
2004-08-27 7:10 ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.7-2 Werner Almesberger
2004-09-05 19:35 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-09-08 23:15 ` Jeff Dike
2004-09-05 15:35 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-09-05 20:28 ` [uml-devel] Current state of UML Jeff Garzik
2004-09-06 17:56 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-09-07 4:40 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-09-07 5:05 ` Adam Heath
2004-09-07 5:13 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-09-07 5:39 ` Adam Heath
2004-09-07 18:13 ` [uml-devel] Current state of UML - some help needed from mainline BlaisorBlade
2004-09-07 18:13 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-09-09 5:30 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-09-09 5:30 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-09-08 20:40 ` [uml-devel] Re: Current state of UML Jeff Dike
2004-09-09 0:35 ` Jeff Dike [this message]
2004-09-09 0:35 ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.7-2 Jeff Dike
2004-09-11 14:41 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-09-11 14:41 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-09-07 21:16 ` [uml-devel] Compiling UML 2.6.8.1 with Static Linking results in segfault Michael Ralston
2004-09-08 0:18 ` Jeff Dike
2004-09-07 23:57 ` Michael Ralston
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200409090035.i890ZYBP016288@ccure.user-mode-linux.org \
--to=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.