All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Dabbs" <david@dabbs.net>
To: 'Jamie Lokier' <jamie@shareable.org>
Cc: 'Christian Mayrhuber' <christian.mayrhuber@gmx.net>,
	reiserfs-list@namesys.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [SPAM] RE: [RFC] Pathname Semantics with //
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:11:56 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040910170731.495DC15C93@mail03.powweb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040910095355.GA20383@mail.shareable.org>



> Jamie Lokier
> 
> David Dabbs wrote:
> 
> > Shooting from the hip here. If we want to unify namespaces in a UNIXy
> way,
> > what if we make the VFS expose all the non-file "protocol" namespaces
> > through one mount point, device node or whatever. A filesystem, perhaps
> > something built using FiST [http://www.filesystems.org/], would "handle"
> a
> > protocol. Another, perhaps preferred, option is to steer in the
> direction of
> > Plan9, where ftp can be mounted and handled by a user-space filesystem,
> > ftpfs.
> > See http://plan9.bell-labs.com/magic/man2html/4/ftpfs
> 
> You can already do it, something like this:
> 
>     mkdir /http:; mount none /http: -t uservfs -o view=http
>     mkdir /ftp:;  mount none /ftp:  -t uservfs -o view=ftp
> 
> I don't see any compelling reason to make "//" special for this.
> However, if there is such a reason, then you could just mount protocol
> handlers on "//http:" and so on, and make "//" a normal directory with
> a special name.
> 
> -- Jamie

Jamie, we _definitely_ agree, except apps that want to create links to URLs
will prepend one slash to the URL instead of two. Is your reference to
uservfs a "foo" reference or do you mean
http://sourceforge.net/projects/uservfs/? It looks a little dusty. But we
are pulling in the same direction.

The /file: node could simply be a symlink. Thus we have

      cd /
      ln -s / file:
      mkdir http:; mount none /http: -t uservfs -o view=http
      mkdir ftp:;  mount none /ftp:  -t uservfs -o view=ftp
      #etc...

Pathnames would be resolved with the existing code in namei.c. I can
understand mounting a URL whose protocol looks like a fs tree (e.g. ftp),
but http? Namei() parses the pathname one component at a time, checks the
dcache, and goes to the fs when that fails. Let's trace through how a URL
might get resolved. 

      ln -s /http://sourceforge.net/projects/uservfs
      cat uservfs

Pathname would be resolved as 

      /http:          
      sourceforge.net/
      projects/
      uservfs

I need to look closer at namei (or the uservfs code if it really supports a
view=http). As long as a fs can generate meaningful, stateful values in
response to VFS calls to real_lookup(), then this may work. 


David



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "David Dabbs" <david@dabbs.net>
To: "'Jamie Lokier'" <jamie@shareable.org>
Cc: "'Christian Mayrhuber'" <christian.mayrhuber@gmx.net>,
	<reiserfs-list@namesys.com>, <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [SPAM] RE: [RFC] Pathname Semantics with //
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:11:56 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040910170731.495DC15C93@mail03.powweb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040910095355.GA20383@mail.shareable.org>



> Jamie Lokier
> 
> David Dabbs wrote:
> 
> > Shooting from the hip here. If we want to unify namespaces in a UNIXy
> way,
> > what if we make the VFS expose all the non-file "protocol" namespaces
> > through one mount point, device node or whatever. A filesystem, perhaps
> > something built using FiST [http://www.filesystems.org/], would "handle"
> a
> > protocol. Another, perhaps preferred, option is to steer in the
> direction of
> > Plan9, where ftp can be mounted and handled by a user-space filesystem,
> > ftpfs.
> > See http://plan9.bell-labs.com/magic/man2html/4/ftpfs
> 
> You can already do it, something like this:
> 
>     mkdir /http:; mount none /http: -t uservfs -o view=http
>     mkdir /ftp:;  mount none /ftp:  -t uservfs -o view=ftp
> 
> I don't see any compelling reason to make "//" special for this.
> However, if there is such a reason, then you could just mount protocol
> handlers on "//http:" and so on, and make "//" a normal directory with
> a special name.
> 
> -- Jamie

Jamie, we _definitely_ agree, except apps that want to create links to URLs
will prepend one slash to the URL instead of two. Is your reference to
uservfs a "foo" reference or do you mean
http://sourceforge.net/projects/uservfs/? It looks a little dusty. But we
are pulling in the same direction.

The /file: node could simply be a symlink. Thus we have

      cd /
      ln -s / file:
      mkdir http:; mount none /http: -t uservfs -o view=http
      mkdir ftp:;  mount none /ftp:  -t uservfs -o view=ftp
      #etc...

Pathnames would be resolved with the existing code in namei.c. I can
understand mounting a URL whose protocol looks like a fs tree (e.g. ftp),
but http? Namei() parses the pathname one component at a time, checks the
dcache, and goes to the fs when that fails. Let's trace through how a URL
might get resolved. 

      ln -s /http://sourceforge.net/projects/uservfs
      cat uservfs

Pathname would be resolved as 

      /http:          
      sourceforge.net/
      projects/
      uservfs

I need to look closer at namei (or the uservfs code if it really supports a
view=http). As long as a fs can generate meaningful, stateful values in
response to VFS calls to real_lookup(), then this may work. 


David

  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-10 17:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-09 10:41 [RFC] Pathname Semantics with // David Dabbs
2004-09-09 10:41 ` David Dabbs
2004-09-08 16:13 ` Hans Reiser
2004-09-09 16:36   ` Peter Foldiak
2004-09-09 19:21   ` David Dabbs
2004-09-09 19:21     ` David Dabbs
2004-09-10  0:49     ` Hans Reiser
2004-09-10  3:06       ` David Dabbs
2004-09-10  3:06         ` David Dabbs
2004-09-10  5:40         ` Hans Reiser
2004-09-09 21:51   ` David Dabbs
2004-09-09 21:51     ` David Dabbs
2004-09-09  6:10     ` Hans Reiser
2004-09-09 17:33 ` Christian Mayrhuber
2004-09-09 20:17   ` David Dabbs
2004-09-09 20:17     ` David Dabbs
2004-09-09 20:41     ` Andreas Dilger
2004-09-10  9:11       ` Markus   Törnqvist
2004-09-10 10:37     ` Christian Mayrhuber
2004-09-09 23:03   ` Jamie Lokier
2004-09-10  1:37     ` David Dabbs
2004-09-10  1:37       ` David Dabbs
2004-09-10  9:53       ` [SPAM] " Jamie Lokier
2004-09-10 17:11         ` David Dabbs [this message]
2004-09-10 17:11           ` David Dabbs
2004-09-10 11:47       ` Christian Mayrhuber
2004-09-10 11:06     ` Christian Mayrhuber

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040910170731.495DC15C93@mail03.powweb.com \
    --to=david@dabbs.net \
    --cc=christian.mayrhuber@gmx.net \
    --cc=jamie@shareable.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.