From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Netfilter Development Mailinglist
<netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6 NETFILTER] new netfilter module ipt_program.c
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 18:57:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040911175726.GD12835@lkcl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41430D5E.9030207@trash.net>
On Sat, Sep 11, 2004 at 04:36:14PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> >On Sat, Sep 11, 2004 at 02:29:35PM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
> >wrote:
> >
> > thing is, you see, i know just enough to be dangerous.
> >
> > using files->file_lock a) seems to work b) is accepted code in the
> > kernel.
>
> It seems to work - on UP where it is a NOP. On SMP it will deadlock.
> That we have some broken code doesn't mean we want more of it :)
*cackle*
> > if someone else has the experience and knowledge to fix ipt_owner.c
> > i'll quite happily cut/paste that instead - once it's fixed.
>
> The "fix" is quite easy, replace all occurences of
> spin_lock(&files->file_lock) in the kernel by spin_lock_bh.
> But that's not going to be accepted.
's'just'a'big'job'for "replace", innit?
[btw _what_ is the "replace" command doing in the debian mysql package??]
> IIRC the SELinux guys
> want to label packets with the name of the sending process,
> maybe we can use this for the owner match once it's done.
... well, given that i'll be rolling this out (broken or not)
on a single-processor SELinux system, whatever is added
[for selinux] would also need to be useable by thingy.
ipt_owner.c. as well.
l.
--
--
Truth, honesty and respect are rare commodities that all spring from
the same well: Love. If you love yourself and everyone and everything
around you, funnily and coincidentally enough, life gets a lot better.
--
<a href="http://lkcl.net"> lkcl.net </a> <br />
<a href="mailto:lkcl@lkcl.net"> lkcl@lkcl.net </a> <br />
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-11 17:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-11 12:41 [PATCH 2.6 NETFILTER] new netfilter module ipt_program.c Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2004-09-11 12:51 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-09-11 12:51 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-09-11 13:29 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2004-09-11 13:34 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2004-09-11 14:36 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-09-11 14:36 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-09-11 17:57 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton [this message]
2004-09-11 14:49 ` Gianni Tedesco
2004-09-11 17:36 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2004-09-13 11:50 ` Maciej Soltysiak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040911175726.GD12835@lkcl.net \
--to=lkcl@lkcl.net \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.