All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
To: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Cc: kronos@kronoz.cjb.net,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	joq@io.com, torbenh@gmx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Realtime LSM
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:34:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040913163448.T1973@build.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1095117752.1360.5.camel@krustophenia.net>; from rlrevell@joe-job.com on Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 07:22:33PM -0400

* Lee Revell (rlrevell@joe-job.com) wrote:
> +Once the LSM has been installed and the kernel for which it was built
> +is running, the root user can load it and pass parameters as follows:
> +
> +  # modprobe realtime any=1
> +
> +  Any program can request realtime privileges.  This allows any local
> +  user to crash the system by hogging the CPU in a tight loop or
> +  locking down too much memory.  But, it is simple to administer.  :-)
> +
> +  # modprobe realtime gid=29
> +
> +  All users belonging to group 29 and programs that are setgid to that
> +  group have realtime privileges.  Use any group number you like.
> +
> +  # modprobe realtime mlock=0
> +
> +  Grants realtime scheduling privileges without the ability to lock
> +  memory using mlock() or mlockall() system calls.  This option can be
> +  used in conjunction with any of the other options.
> +
> +  # modprobe realtime allcaps=1
> +
> +  Enables all capabilities, including CAP_SETPCAP.  This is equivalent
> +  to the 2.4 kernel capabilities patch.  It is needed for root
> +  programs to assign realtime capabilities to other processes.  This
> +  option can be used in conjunction with any of the other options.

The mlock() bit is unecessary now.  Use rlimits on the audio users.
Which leaves realtime bits, plus others.  I had a more generic module
(per-capability) that would be a superset of this.  Perhaps that's a
better fit.  I'm travelling this week, so forgive the spotty replies.

thanks,
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net

  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-13 23:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-12  5:46 [PATCH] Realtime LSM Lee Revell
2004-09-12 13:58 ` James Morris
2004-09-12 14:05   ` James Morris
2004-09-12 19:03   ` Lee Revell
2004-09-12 19:16   ` Jack O'Quin
2004-09-16  2:31     ` Jody McIntyre
2004-09-16  4:48       ` Jack O'Quin
2004-09-16 15:51         ` Jody McIntyre
2004-09-16 18:27           ` Jack O'Quin
2004-09-17  7:08             ` torbenh
2004-09-17 20:01               ` Jack O'Quin
2004-09-20 20:20                 ` Jody McIntyre
2004-09-12 15:50 ` Kronos
2004-09-13 23:22   ` Lee Revell
2004-09-13 23:34     ` Chris Wright [this message]
2004-09-14  2:18       ` Lee Revell
2004-09-14  3:01         ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-14  3:46           ` Lee Revell
2004-09-14  3:50             ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-20 20:23 ` Jody McIntyre
2004-09-21  0:11   ` Jack O'Quin
2004-09-21  7:52     ` torbenh
2004-09-30 21:14   ` Jody McIntyre
2004-09-30 21:53     ` Lee Revell
2004-10-01  0:37       ` Jack O'Quin
2004-10-01  1:20         ` Chris Wright
2004-10-01  4:05           ` Jack O'Quin
2004-10-01 20:40             ` Lee Revell
2004-10-01 21:23               ` Chris Wright
2004-10-01 22:19                 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-01 22:27                   ` Chris Wright
2004-10-01 22:32                     ` Lee Revell
2004-10-01 22:44                       ` Chris Wright
2004-10-05  5:55                     ` Jack O'Quin
2004-10-07 23:51                       ` Lee Revell
2004-10-08 20:58                         ` Lee Revell
2004-10-08 21:21                           ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-08 21:22                             ` Lee Revell
2004-10-08 21:25                             ` Lee Revell
2004-10-08 21:45                           ` Chris Wright
2004-10-08 21:49                             ` Lee Revell
2004-10-08 21:52                               ` Chris Wright
2004-10-08 22:05                                 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-08 22:09                                   ` Chris Wright
2004-10-08 22:19                                   ` Chris Wright
2004-10-08 22:24                                     ` Chris Wright
2004-10-08 23:05                                       ` Lee Revell
2004-10-08 23:12                                         ` Chris Wright
2004-10-08 23:15                                           ` Lee Revell
2004-10-08 23:20                                             ` Chris Wright
2004-10-09  1:01                                       ` Jack O'Quin
2004-10-09  5:16                                         ` Chris Wright
2004-10-09 16:16                                           ` Jack O'Quin
2004-10-09 19:11                                             ` Chris Wright
2004-10-09 20:27                                               ` Jack O'Quin
2004-10-09 22:53                                                 ` Chris Wright
2004-10-22 23:59                                                   ` Jack O'Quin
2004-10-23  0:36                                                     ` Lee Revell
2004-10-23  1:23                                                     ` Jack O'Quin
2004-10-23  1:27                                                       ` Lee Revell
2004-10-23  5:08                                                         ` Jack O'Quin
2004-10-23 18:17                                                           ` Jack O'Quin
2004-10-25  2:03                                                             ` Jack O'Quin
2004-10-23 20:04                                                     ` Chris Wright
2004-10-05  4:00     ` Jack O'Quin
2004-10-15  1:55     ` Rusty Russell
2004-10-15  2:08       ` Lee Revell
     [not found] <87acu0p0nw.fsf@sulphur.joq.us>
2004-11-09 22:39 ` Jack O'Quin
2004-11-20  2:44   ` Lee Revell
2004-11-20  3:55   ` Lee Revell
2004-11-20  6:19     ` Jack O'Quin
2004-11-20  6:43       ` Lee Revell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040913163448.T1973@build.pdx.osdl.net \
    --to=chrisw@osdl.org \
    --cc=joq@io.com \
    --cc=kronos@kronoz.cjb.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
    --cc=torbenh@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.