From: Mads Martin Joergensen <mmj@mmj.dk>
To: mlmmj@mlmmj.org
Subject: Re: feature requests
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 21:00:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040920210023.GX76919@mmj.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040920191944.GA5112@cirrus.madduck.net>
* martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net> [Sep 20. 2004 22:59]:
> also sprach Mads Martin Joergensen <mmj@mmj.dk> [2004.09.20.2254 +0200]:
> > No, it's not not necessary. It's a bug--allthough quite harmless.
> > It'll be fixed in next version--we already use Delivered-To: for
> > sanity checks, so might as well use it exclusively if present.
>
> Right. Please consider that Delivered-To is non-standard. Postfix
> and qmail do it. exim and sendmail don't, I think.
Yeah, if it's there it's used, if not fallback to To: is done. It's a
shame it didn't make it into the standards.
--
Mads Martin Joergensen, http://mmj.dk
"Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic
and totally illogical, with just a little bit more effort?"
-- A. P. J.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-20 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-20 19:19 feature requests martin f krafft
2004-09-20 19:33 ` Mads Martin Joergensen
2004-09-20 19:56 ` martin f krafft
2004-09-20 20:04 ` Mads Martin Joergensen
2004-09-20 20:10 ` martin f krafft
2004-09-20 20:24 ` Mads Martin Joergensen
2004-09-20 20:28 ` Mads Martin Joergensen
2004-09-20 20:38 ` martin f krafft
2004-09-20 20:54 ` Mads Martin Joergensen
2004-09-20 20:59 ` martin f krafft
2004-09-20 21:00 ` Mads Martin Joergensen [this message]
2004-09-20 21:04 ` martin f krafft
2004-09-20 21:05 ` Mads Martin Joergensen
2004-09-20 21:15 ` martin f krafft
2004-09-20 21:17 ` Mads Martin Joergensen
2004-09-20 21:21 ` martin f krafft
2004-09-20 21:25 ` Mads Martin Joergensen
2004-09-21 10:42 ` Morten K. Poulsen
2004-09-21 14:22 ` martin f krafft
2004-09-21 14:54 ` Morten K. Poulsen
2004-09-21 14:59 ` martin f krafft
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-12-06 22:07 b4 prep HEAD fails when specifying branch point Mark Brown
2022-12-06 22:15 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2022-12-06 23:52 ` Feature requests Mark Brown
2022-12-09 21:09 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2022-12-12 12:22 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040920210023.GX76919@mmj.dk \
--to=mmj@mmj.dk \
--cc=mlmmj@mlmmj.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.