From: Tonnerre <tonnerre@thundrix.ch>
To: Thomas Habets <thomas@habets.pp.se>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oom_pardon, aka don't kill my xlock
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 06:45:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040923044549.GE6889@thundrix.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200409230123.30858.thomas@habets.pp.se>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3889 bytes --]
Salut,
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 01:23:08AM +0200, Thomas Habets wrote:
> diff -Nur linux-2.6.7.orig/CREDITS linux-2.6.7/CREDITS
> --- linux-2.6.7.orig/CREDITS 2004-06-16 07:19:43.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.7/CREDITS 2004-09-23 00:02:44.000000000 +0200
> @@ -1210,6 +1210,14 @@
> W: http://www.inf.fu-berlin.de/~ehaase
> D: Driver for the Commodore A2232 serial board
>
> +N: Thomas Habets
> +E: thomas@habets.pp.se
> +D: random Linux hacker
> +P: 1024D/AD48E854 A8A3 D1DD 4AE0 8467 7FDE 0945 286A E90A AD48 E854
> +S: Tunnlandsvägen 40
> +S: 168 36 Bromma
> +S: Sweden
> +
> N: Bruno Haible
> E: haible@ma2s2.mathematik.uni-karlsruhe.de
> D: SysV FS, shm swapping, memory management fixes
That should be D: OOM killer exceptions or whatever, I suppose.
> diff -Nur linux-2.6.7.orig/kernel/sysctl.c linux-2.6.7/kernel/sysctl.c
> --- linux-2.6.7.orig/kernel/sysctl.c 2004-06-16 07:18:58.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.7/kernel/sysctl.c 2004-09-23 00:28:51.000000000 +0200
> @@ -795,6 +795,15 @@
> .strategy = &sysctl_intvec,
> .extra1 = &zero,
> },
> + {
> + .ctl_name = VM_OOM_PARDON,
> + .procname = "oom_pardon",
> + .data = &vm_oom_pardon,
> + .maxlen = sizeof(vm_oom_pardon),
> + .mode = 0644,
> + .proc_handler = &proc_doutsstring,
> + .strategy = &sysctl_string,
> + },
> { .ctl_name = 0 }
> };
>
A sysctl is a bad implementation since you can only store one single
string in it.
> diff -Nur linux-2.6.7.orig/mm/oom_kill.c linux-2.6.7/mm/oom_kill.c
> --- linux-2.6.7.orig/mm/oom_kill.c 2004-06-16 07:19:29.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.7/mm/oom_kill.c 2004-09-23 00:31:12.000000000 +0200
> @@ -16,14 +16,56 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> +#include <linux/utsname.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <linux/swap.h>
> #include <linux/timex.h>
> #include <linux/jiffies.h>
>
> +char vm_oom_pardon[VM_OOM_PARDON_LEN];
> /* #define DEBUG */
>
> /**
> + * For the love of kbaek, don't kill processes in /proc/sys/vm/oom_pardon
> + */
> +static int pardon(struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> + static char buf[256];
That 256 should be VM_OOM_PARDON_LEN ?
> + const struct qstr *exe;
> + const char *p;
> + int len;
> +
> + exe = &task->proc_dentry->d_name;
> + len = min((int)exe->len, (int)(sizeof(buf) - 2));
Dito.
> + memcpy(buf, exe->name, len);
> + buf[len] = 0;
> + buf[len+1] = 0;
> +
> + if (strchr(buf, ' ')) {
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + down_read(&uts_sem);
We're under the task lock, and you want us to sleep here? There's a
little problem: we'd want to switch the task, and since the task lock
is taken, we'll wait an infinite amount of time (yes, literally!) for
it to become free.
> + p = vm_oom_pardon;
> + do {
> + buf[len] = ' ';
> + if (!strncmp(p, buf, len)) {
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + buf[len] = 0;
> + if (!strcmp(p, buf)) {
> + return 1;
> + }
> + p = strchr(p, ' ');
> + } while(p++);
What about programs with spaces in its names?
Actually, I'd really use a different interface to register and
unregister processes to protect. And maybe not (just) by the binary
name. Make a real filter list, or track them by pid.
> + up_read(&uts_sem);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> * oom_badness - calculate a numeric value for how bad this task has been
> * @p: task struct of which task we should calculate
> *
Tonnerre
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-23 4:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-22 23:23 [PATCH] oom_pardon, aka don't kill my xlock Thomas Habets
2004-09-23 0:01 ` Nick Piggin
2004-09-23 0:07 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-23 4:45 ` Tonnerre [this message]
2004-09-23 6:57 ` Thomas Habets
2004-09-23 12:24 ` Tonnerre
2004-09-23 13:32 ` Thomas Habets
2004-09-23 23:45 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-09-24 13:19 ` Alan Cox
2004-09-24 19:58 ` Thomas Habets
2004-09-24 21:15 ` Alan Cox
2004-09-25 10:08 ` Thomas Habets
2004-09-27 10:41 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-09-27 12:54 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2004-09-27 13:12 ` Jon Masters
2004-09-27 12:36 ` Alan Cox
2004-09-27 13:35 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-09-27 15:59 ` Jon Masters
2004-09-27 17:12 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-09-27 16:42 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-09-28 13:33 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-09-28 12:32 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-09-28 23:55 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-09-27 23:07 ` Jon Masters
2004-09-29 0:49 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-09-24 14:07 ` Pavel Machek
2004-09-24 22:57 ` Jon Masters
2004-09-25 16:32 ` Andrea Arcangeli
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-09-27 12:00 Thomas Habets
2004-09-27 12:17 ` Jon Masters
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040923044549.GE6889@thundrix.ch \
--to=tonnerre@thundrix.ch \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas@habets.pp.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.