All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
To: chas3@users.sourceforge.net
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, davem@redhat.com, kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
Subject: [Kernel-janitors] Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [drivers] use msleep() instead
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:07:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040923160710.GB1699@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200409212029.i8LKTINv010576@ginger.cmf.nrl.navy.mil>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 591 bytes --]

On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 04:29:19PM -0400, chas williams (contractor) wrote:

<snip>
> diff -Nru a/drivers/atm/lanai.c b/drivers/atm/lanai.c
> --- a/drivers/atm/lanai.c	2004-09-21 12:48:17 -04:00
> +++ b/drivers/atm/lanai.c	2004-09-21 12:48:17 -04:00
> @@ -813,7 +813,7 @@
>  			DPRINTK("read, write = %d, %d\n", read, write);
>  			break;
>  		}
> -		schedule_timeout(HZ / 25);
> +		msleep(4);

Somehow this got changed for msleep(40); to msleep(4); !! :) The patch I
sent on 15 September had msleep(40); in it, at least. If you could make
the change in your bk, that would be great!

-Nish

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 167 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
To: chas3@users.sourceforge.net
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, davem@redhat.com, kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [drivers] use msleep() instead of schedule_timeout() (from Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>)
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:07:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040923160710.GB1699@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200409212029.i8LKTINv010576@ginger.cmf.nrl.navy.mil>

On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 04:29:19PM -0400, chas williams (contractor) wrote:

<snip>
> diff -Nru a/drivers/atm/lanai.c b/drivers/atm/lanai.c
> --- a/drivers/atm/lanai.c	2004-09-21 12:48:17 -04:00
> +++ b/drivers/atm/lanai.c	2004-09-21 12:48:17 -04:00
> @@ -813,7 +813,7 @@
>  			DPRINTK("read, write = %d, %d\n", read, write);
>  			break;
>  		}
> -		schedule_timeout(HZ / 25);
> +		msleep(4);

Somehow this got changed for msleep(40); to msleep(4); !! :) The patch I
sent on 15 September had msleep(40); in it, at least. If you could make
the change in your bk, that would be great!

-Nish

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-09-23 16:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-21 20:29 [Kernel-janitors] [PATCH][ATM]: [drivers] use msleep() instead of chas williams (contractor)
2004-09-21 20:29 ` [PATCH][ATM]: [drivers] use msleep() instead of schedule_timeout() (from Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>) chas williams (contractor)
2004-09-21 22:18 ` [Kernel-janitors] Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [drivers] use msleep() instead David S. Miller
2004-09-21 22:18   ` [PATCH][ATM]: [drivers] use msleep() instead of schedule_timeout() (from Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>) David S. Miller
2004-09-23 16:07 ` Nishanth Aravamudan [this message]
2004-09-23 16:07   ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2004-09-23 16:26   ` [Kernel-janitors] Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [drivers] use msleep() instead chas williams (contractor)
2004-09-23 16:26     ` [PATCH][ATM]: [drivers] use msleep() instead of schedule_timeout() (from Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>) chas williams (contractor)
2004-09-23 20:30     ` [Kernel-janitors] Re: [PATCH][ATM]: [drivers] use msleep() instead David S. Miller
2004-09-23 20:30       ` [PATCH][ATM]: [drivers] use msleep() instead of schedule_timeout() (from Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>) David S. Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040923160710.GB1699@us.ibm.com \
    --to=nacc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=chas3@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.