* bad news? got vs-8115 again
@ 2004-09-23 18:10 Tom Vier
2004-09-23 18:40 ` Christian Mayrhuber
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tom Vier @ 2004-09-23 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: reiserfs-list
this time on a server i'm putting into use soon:
ReiserFS: md0: warning: vs-8115: get_num_ver: not directory item
ReiserFS: md0: warning: vs-8115: get_num_ver: not directory item
this time it's raid 1 (last time it was raid 0, on a different machine).
both running 2.6.8.
nothing seems to have been affected either time. is this something i can
ignore? get_num_ver is being handed something it's not supposted to see,
correct?
--
Tom Vier <tmv@comcast.net>
DSA Key ID 0x15741ECE
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: bad news? got vs-8115 again
2004-09-23 18:10 bad news? got vs-8115 again Tom Vier
@ 2004-09-23 18:40 ` Christian Mayrhuber
2004-09-23 19:44 ` Tom Vier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christian Mayrhuber @ 2004-09-23 18:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Vier, reiserfs-list
On Thursday 23 September 2004 20:10, Tom Vier wrote:
> this time on a server i'm putting into use soon:
>
> ReiserFS: md0: warning: vs-8115: get_num_ver: not directory item
> ReiserFS: md0: warning: vs-8115: get_num_ver: not directory item
>
> this time it's raid 1 (last time it was raid 0, on a different machine).
> both running 2.6.8.
>
> nothing seems to have been affected either time. is this something i can
> ignore? get_num_ver is being handed something it's not supposted to see,
> correct?
>
> --
> Tom Vier <tmv@comcast.net>
> DSA Key ID 0x15741ECE
>
You are asking this question a second time and you will get the same answer:
Quoting Vladimir Saveliev <vs@namesys.com>
> Hello
>
> On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 20:33, Hubert Chan wrote:
> > >>>>> "Vladimir" == Vladimir Saveliev <vs@namesys.com> writes:
> >
> > Vladimir> Hello
> > Vladimir> On Mon, 2004-05-24 at 20:21, Hubert Chan wrote:
> > >> I got that message a few times (but not every time) while doing
> > >> "apt-cache show ...". Can someone tell me what that message means,
> > >> and if I should be worried about my data?
> > >>
> >
> > Vladimir> What kernel do you use?
> >
> > Sorry. 2.6.4.
>
> vs-8115 is harmless in this kernel.
>
> > I might have added some of Chris Mason's patches --
> > looks like possibly journal-writer, nesting, iosize, but I'm not
> > entirely sure.
>
I think I saw -mm changelog with a patch that disables this warning.
Highly likely that kernel 2.6.9 won't spit this out again.
--
lg, Chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: bad news? got vs-8115 again
2004-09-23 18:40 ` Christian Mayrhuber
@ 2004-09-23 19:44 ` Tom Vier
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tom Vier @ 2004-09-23 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Mayrhuber; +Cc: reiserfs-list
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 08:40:33PM +0200, Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
> You are asking this question a second time and you will get the same answer:
nevermind, somehow i missed that reply. thanks for quoting it.
--
Tom Vier <tmv@comcast.net>
DSA Key ID 0x15741ECE
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-09-23 19:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-09-23 18:10 bad news? got vs-8115 again Tom Vier
2004-09-23 18:40 ` Christian Mayrhuber
2004-09-23 19:44 ` Tom Vier
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.