From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [RFC] ARM binutils feature churn causing kernel problems
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 21:35:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040927213532.C26680@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040927211750.A27684@infradead.org>; from hch@infradead.org on Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 09:17:50PM +0100
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 09:17:50PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >From loooking at the gcc and binutils lists it seems codesourcery is pushing
> through all the ARM EABI bullshit. Maybe we can persuade hjl to keep it
> out of his bintuils release? So far we've been served far better with them
> on Linux anyway..
Maybe... though I'd like to get some sort of concensus on the specific
issue I mentioned so I can provide an adequate response back to the
folk involved in this specific issue - both the users _and_ the
developers of the toolchain.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/
2.6 Serial core
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-27 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-27 20:03 [RFC] ARM binutils feature churn causing kernel problems Russell King
2004-09-27 20:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-09-27 20:35 ` Russell King [this message]
2004-09-27 20:37 ` Nicolas Pitre
2004-10-01 20:11 ` Russell King
2004-10-04 12:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2004-10-04 23:18 ` Rusty Russell
2004-10-05 11:10 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-10-05 11:53 ` Russell King
2004-10-05 12:57 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-10-05 13:14 ` Russell King
2004-10-05 13:40 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-10-05 13:51 ` Russell King
2004-10-06 10:08 ` Adrian Cox
2004-10-07 15:02 ` Russell King
2004-10-12 13:15 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-10-07 14:54 ` Russell King
2004-10-05 23:00 ` Rusty Russell
2004-10-07 12:35 ` Paulo Marques
2004-10-07 15:01 ` Russell King
2004-10-07 16:39 ` Paulo Marques
2004-10-05 13:02 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-10-08 15:04 ` Russell King
2004-10-08 16:36 ` Paulo Marques
2004-10-08 18:14 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-10-08 19:43 ` Paulo Marques
2004-10-20 11:38 ` [PATCH] Fix ARM kernel build with permitted binutils versions Russell King
2004-10-26 22:37 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040927213532.C26680@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.