From: Richard Earnshaw <richard.earnshaw@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] ARM binutils feature churn causing kernel problems
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 11:10:46 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <loom.20041005T130541-400@post.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1096931899.32500.37.camel@localhost.localdomain
Rusty Russell <rusty <at> rustcorp.com.au> writes:
> Russell, I thought about not including any symbol which is not of form
> "[A-Za-z0-9_]+" in kallsyms, for all archs: you are not the only one
> with weird-ass symbols. Is it that you want these mapping symbols in
> /proc/kallsyms but ignored in backtraces, or you don't need them in
> kallsyms altogether?
>
> Thanks,
> Rusty.
Mapping symbols will always be encoded with STB_LOCAL and STT_NOTYPE. I would
have thought it unlikely that the kernel would ever want to report against any
symbol with those attributes and they could all be dropped on that basis.
R.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-05 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-27 20:03 [RFC] ARM binutils feature churn causing kernel problems Russell King
2004-09-27 20:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-09-27 20:35 ` Russell King
2004-09-27 20:37 ` Nicolas Pitre
2004-10-01 20:11 ` Russell King
2004-10-04 12:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2004-10-04 23:18 ` Rusty Russell
2004-10-05 11:10 ` Richard Earnshaw [this message]
2004-10-05 11:53 ` Russell King
2004-10-05 12:57 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-10-05 13:14 ` Russell King
2004-10-05 13:40 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-10-05 13:51 ` Russell King
2004-10-06 10:08 ` Adrian Cox
2004-10-07 15:02 ` Russell King
2004-10-12 13:15 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-10-07 14:54 ` Russell King
2004-10-05 23:00 ` Rusty Russell
2004-10-07 12:35 ` Paulo Marques
2004-10-07 15:01 ` Russell King
2004-10-07 16:39 ` Paulo Marques
2004-10-05 13:02 ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-10-08 15:04 ` Russell King
2004-10-08 16:36 ` Paulo Marques
2004-10-08 18:14 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-10-08 19:43 ` Paulo Marques
2004-10-20 11:38 ` [PATCH] Fix ARM kernel build with permitted binutils versions Russell King
2004-10-26 22:37 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=loom.20041005T130541-400@post.gmane.org \
--to=richard.earnshaw@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.