All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Timur Tabi <timur.tabi@ammasso.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org
Subject: Re: get_user_pages() still broken in 2.6
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:03:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040929000325.A6758@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4159E85A.6080806@ammasso.com>; from timur.tabi@ammasso.com on Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 05:40:26PM -0500

On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 05:40:26PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> I was hoping that this bug would be fixed in the 2.6 kernels, but 
> apparently it hasn't been.
> 
> Function get_user_pages() is supposed to lock user memory.  However, 
> under extreme memory constraints, the kernel will swap out the "locked" 
> memory.
> 
> I have a test app which does this:
> 
> 1) Calls our driver, which issues a get_user_pages() call for one page.
> 2) Calls our driver again to get the physical address of that page (the 
> driver uses pgd/pmd/pte_offset).
> 3) Tries allocate 1GB of memory (this system has 1GB of physical RAM).
> 4) Tries to get the physical address again.
> 
> In step 4, the physical address is usually zero, which means either 
> pgd_offset or pmd_offset failed.  This indicates the page was swapped out.
> 
> I don't understand how this bug can continue to exist after all this 
> time.  get_user_pages() is supposed to lock the memory, because drivers 
> use it for DMA'ing directly into user memory.

get_user_pages locks the page in memory.  It doesn't do anything about ptes.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Timur Tabi <timur.tabi@ammasso.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org
Subject: Re: get_user_pages() still broken in 2.6
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:03:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040929000325.A6758@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4159E85A.6080806@ammasso.com>; from timur.tabi@ammasso.com on Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 05:40:26PM -0500

On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 05:40:26PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> I was hoping that this bug would be fixed in the 2.6 kernels, but 
> apparently it hasn't been.
> 
> Function get_user_pages() is supposed to lock user memory.  However, 
> under extreme memory constraints, the kernel will swap out the "locked" 
> memory.
> 
> I have a test app which does this:
> 
> 1) Calls our driver, which issues a get_user_pages() call for one page.
> 2) Calls our driver again to get the physical address of that page (the 
> driver uses pgd/pmd/pte_offset).
> 3) Tries allocate 1GB of memory (this system has 1GB of physical RAM).
> 4) Tries to get the physical address again.
> 
> In step 4, the physical address is usually zero, which means either 
> pgd_offset or pmd_offset failed.  This indicates the page was swapped out.
> 
> I don't understand how this bug can continue to exist after all this 
> time.  get_user_pages() is supposed to lock the memory, because drivers 
> use it for DMA'ing directly into user memory.

get_user_pages locks the page in memory.  It doesn't do anything about ptes.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-28 23:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-28 22:40 get_user_pages() still broken in 2.6 Timur Tabi
2004-09-28 22:40 ` Timur Tabi
2004-09-28 23:03 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2004-09-28 23:03   ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-09-28 23:21   ` Dave Hansen
2004-09-28 23:21     ` Dave Hansen
2004-09-29 14:46     ` Timur Tabi
2004-09-29 14:46       ` Timur Tabi
2004-09-29 14:48   ` Timur Tabi
2004-09-29 14:48     ` Timur Tabi
2004-09-29 15:01     ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-09-29 15:01       ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-09-29  4:49 ` opening a file inside the kernel module Rakesh Jagota
2004-09-29  4:49   ` Rakesh Jagota
2004-09-29  5:00   ` Jeff Garzik
2004-09-29  5:00     ` Jeff Garzik
2004-09-29  5:56     ` Rakesh Jagota
2004-09-29  5:56       ` Rakesh Jagota
2004-09-29 15:52       ` Stuart MacDonald
2004-09-29 15:52         ` Stuart MacDonald, linux-kernel-owner
     [not found] <2JyXo-77W-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <2JzgH-7rT-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <2JOpu-1y1-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-09-29 15:41     ` get_user_pages() still broken in 2.6 Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040929000325.A6758@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=timur.tabi@ammasso.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.