From: Domen Puncer <domen@coderock.org>
To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Kernel-janitors] Re: usb/auerswald: reorder set_current_state()
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:42:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040929174235.GC3599@masina.coderock.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040929163014.GB3599@masina.coderock.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1099 bytes --]
On 29/09/04 10:22 -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 06:30:14PM +0200, Domen Puncer wrote:
> > On 27/09/04 14:46 -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > > +++ 2.6.9-rc2/drivers/usb/misc/auerswald.c 2004-09-27 14:42:24.000000000 -0700
> > > @@ -626,8 +626,8 @@ static int auerchain_start_wait_urb (pau
> > >
> > > while (timeout && !chs.done)
> > > {
> > > - timeout = schedule_timeout (timeout);
> > > set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> > > + timeout = schedule_timeout (timeout);
> > > rmb();
> > > }
> > >
> > Now "set_current_state (TASK_RUNNING);" a line under this isn't
> > needed anymore, right?
>
> I think it is still needed, because the state is initially set just before
> add_wait_queue() [before the if] to TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE. So, in the off
> chance that the while-loop's condition is false on the first iteration,
> the state needs to be set back to TASK_RUNNING, since schedule_timeout()
> won't be run at all.
You're right, missed that.
So... in the first iteration, schedule won't return instantly =>
patch isn't needed?
Domen
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 167 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-29 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-29 16:30 [Kernel-janitors] Re: usb/auerswald: reorder set_current_state() Domen Puncer
2004-09-29 17:22 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2004-09-29 17:42 ` Domen Puncer [this message]
2004-09-29 18:00 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2004-09-29 22:44 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040929174235.GC3599@masina.coderock.org \
--to=domen@coderock.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.