From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Kernel-janitors] Re: usb/auerswald: reorder set_current_state()
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:44:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040929224426.GF1652@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040929163014.GB3599@masina.coderock.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1864 bytes --]
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 11:00:07AM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 07:42:35PM +0200, Domen Puncer wrote:
> > On 29/09/04 10:22 -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 06:30:14PM +0200, Domen Puncer wrote:
> > > > On 27/09/04 14:46 -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > > > > +++ 2.6.9-rc2/drivers/usb/misc/auerswald.c 2004-09-27 14:42:24.000000000 -0700
> > > > > @@ -626,8 +626,8 @@ static int auerchain_start_wait_urb (pau
> > > > >
> > > > > while (timeout && !chs.done)
> > > > > {
> > > > > - timeout = schedule_timeout (timeout);
> > > > > set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> > > > > + timeout = schedule_timeout (timeout);
> > > > > rmb();
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > Now "set_current_state (TASK_RUNNING);" a line under this isn't
> > > > needed anymore, right?
> > >
> > > I think it is still needed, because the state is initially set just before
> > > add_wait_queue() [before the if] to TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE. So, in the off
> > > chance that the while-loop's condition is false on the first iteration,
> > > the state needs to be set back to TASK_RUNNING, since schedule_timeout()
> > > won't be run at all.
> >
> > You're right, missed that.
> > So... in the first iteration, schedule won't return instantly =>
> > patch isn't needed?
>
> You're right, actually. The one thing I'm not sure about is if the state
> is meant to be set before the add_wait_queue(). I'm not sure if this
> driver needs to be in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE for the assignment and
> auerchain_submit_urb(). If anyone has any input on that, it would be
> great.
Didn't say this explicitly, I realized: For now, don't apply this patch.
once I have some more details on the necessity of auerchain_submit_urb()
running in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, I will resubmit the patch (if
necessary, of course).
-Nish
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 167 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-29 22:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-29 16:30 [Kernel-janitors] Re: usb/auerswald: reorder set_current_state() Domen Puncer
2004-09-29 17:22 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2004-09-29 17:42 ` Domen Puncer
2004-09-29 18:00 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2004-09-29 22:44 ` Nishanth Aravamudan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040929224426.GF1652@us.ibm.com \
--to=nacc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.