From: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: piggin@cyberone.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Page cache write performance issue
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:39:55 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041013063955.GA2079@frodo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041012231945.2aff9a00.akpm@osdl.org>
Hi Andrew,
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 11:19:45PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com> wrote:
> >
> > So, any ideas what happened to 2.6.9?
>
> Does reverting the below fix it up?
Reverting that one improves things slightly - I move up from
~4MB/sec to ~17MB/sec; thats just under a third of the 2.6.8
numbers I was seeing though, unfortunately.
cheers.
--
Nathan
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: piggin@cyberone.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Page cache write performance issue
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:39:55 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041013063955.GA2079@frodo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041012231945.2aff9a00.akpm@osdl.org>
Hi Andrew,
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 11:19:45PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com> wrote:
> >
> > So, any ideas what happened to 2.6.9?
>
> Does reverting the below fix it up?
Reverting that one improves things slightly - I move up from
~4MB/sec to ~17MB/sec; thats just under a third of the 2.6.8
numbers I was seeing though, unfortunately.
cheers.
--
Nathan
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-13 6:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-13 5:44 Page cache write performance issue Nathan Scott
2004-10-13 5:44 ` Nathan Scott
2004-10-13 6:19 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-13 6:19 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-13 6:39 ` Nathan Scott [this message]
2004-10-13 6:39 ` Nathan Scott
2004-10-13 7:02 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-13 7:02 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-13 7:23 ` Nathan Scott
2004-10-13 7:23 ` Nathan Scott
2004-10-13 8:15 ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-13 8:15 ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-13 8:39 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-13 8:39 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-14 0:53 ` Nathan Scott
2004-10-14 0:53 ` Nathan Scott
2004-10-14 3:20 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-14 3:20 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-14 7:16 ` Nathan Scott
2004-10-14 7:16 ` Nathan Scott
2004-10-14 7:31 ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-14 7:31 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041013063955.GA2079@frodo \
--to=nathans@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.