All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Marc" <linux-raid@liquid-nexus.net>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Poor RAID5 performance on new SMP system
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 10:11:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041018015803.M50347@liquid-nexus.net> (raw)

Hi,
I recently upgraded my file server to a dual AMD 2800+ on a Tyan Tiger MPX 
motherboard. The previous server was using a PIII 700 on an Intel 440BX 
motherboard. I basically just took the IDE drives and their controllers 
across to the new machine. The strange thing is that the RAID-5 performance 
is worse than before! Have a look at the stats below:

I've fiddled with hdparm making sure the drives are setup correctly 
(dma,32bit,unmaskirq) but without much improvement.

As a comparison I ran the same benchmark against the -single- (root) 
drive /dev/hda and it performed better than the raid array!!

I'm using kernel version 2.4.26 SMP. Do you think upgrading to 2.6.8 would 
improve matters? 

The only guess I can make is that there is an issue with software raid 
performance on an SMP system. 

Any help/suggestions appreciated!

Thanks...


----------------------------------------------------------
Bonnie++ benchmarks:

Before (PIII 700/440BX):

128k chunk
              -------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --
Random--
              -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks-
--
Machine    MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU  /sec %
CPU
         1000  7594 85.1 36234 43.0 22728 31.1  8812 96.1 58155 52.5 286.8  
5.6

After: (Dual AMD MP 2800+/Tiger MPX(AMD760)

              -------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --
Random--
              -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks-
--
Machine    MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU  /sec %
CPU
         1000 16707 97.7 20745 16.4  9633  9.8 17032 67.2 24741 11.4 194.8  
2.1

/dev/md0:
        Version : 00.90.00
  Creation Time : Sat Apr 17 12:19:25 2004
     Raid Level : raid5
     Array Size : 234444288 (223.58 GiB 240.07 GB)
    Device Size : 78148096 (74.53 GiB 80.02 GB)
   Raid Devices : 4
  Total Devices : 5
Preferred Minor : 0
    Persistence : Superblock is persistent

    Update Time : Mon Oct 18 08:36:52 2004
          State : dirty, no-errors
 Active Devices : 4
Working Devices : 4
 Failed Devices : 1
  Spare Devices : 0

         Layout : left-symmetric
     Chunk Size : 128K

    Number   Major   Minor   RaidDevice State
       0      33        1        0      active sync   /dev/hde1
       1      34        1        1      active sync   /dev/hdg1
       2      56        1        2      active sync   /dev/hdi1
       3      57        1        3      active sync   /dev/hdk1
           UUID : 775f1dcf:7cbc17ab:86e1e792:669b732f
         Events : 0.82

lspci:
0000:00:00.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] AMD-760 MP [IGD4-2P] 
System Controller (rev 20)
0000:00:01.0 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] AMD-760 MP [IGD4-2P] 
AGP Bridge
0000:00:07.0 ISA bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] AMD-768 [Opus] ISA 
(rev 05)
0000:00:07.1 IDE interface: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] AMD-768 [Opus] IDE 
(rev 04)
0000:00:07.3 Bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] AMD-768 [Opus] ACPI (rev 
03)
0000:00:10.0 PCI bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] AMD-768 [Opus] PCI 
(rev 05)
0000:02:00.0 USB Controller: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] AMD-768 [Opus] USB 
(rev 07)
0000:02:04.0 VGA compatible controller: NVidia / SGS Thomson (Joint Venture) 
Riva128 (rev 10)
0000:02:05.0 RAID bus controller: Silicon Image, Inc. (formerly CMD 
Technology Inc) PCI0680 Ultra ATA-133 Host Controller (rev 02)
0000:02:06.0 RAID bus controller: Silicon Image, Inc. (formerly CMD 
Technology Inc) PCI0649 (rev 02)
0000:02:07.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Texas Instruments TSB12LV23 IEEE-1394 
Controller
0000:02:08.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c905C-TX/TX-M [Tornado] 
(rev 78)

--


             reply	other threads:[~2004-10-18  2:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-18  2:11 Marc [this message]
2004-10-18  3:37 ` Poor RAID5 performance on new SMP system Guy
2004-10-18  4:04   ` Marc
2004-10-18  5:12     ` Guy
2004-10-18  3:44 ` Richard Scobie
2004-10-18  4:56   ` Marc
2004-10-18 17:26   ` Marc Marais
2004-10-18 18:41     ` Richard Scobie
2004-10-18 20:45       ` Guy
2004-10-20  3:24       ` Mark Hahn
2004-10-18  5:37 ` Gerd Knops
2004-10-18  6:12   ` Guy
2004-10-18  7:33     ` Marc

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041018015803.M50347@liquid-nexus.net \
    --to=linux-raid@liquid-nexus.net \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.