All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Scobie <richard@sauce.co.nz>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Poor RAID5 performance on new SMP system
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 07:41:53 +1300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41740E71.4090907@sauce.co.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041018172202.M60005@liquid-nexus.net>

Marc Marais wrote:
> I've moved one of the IDE cards to the 64 bit bus and thats improved things a
> lot. The 2nd card isnt 3.3v capable and won't go into the 64 bit slot though
> so I'm going to replace it. 
> 
> I noticed using vmstat that the average latency (await) is over 50ms for the
> card on the secondary PCI bus and less than 20ms on the 64 bit bus... Very
> interesting...

Glad it's not going to be a total loss.

I find AMD's behaviour over this bug to be very disappointing - 
motherboards using this broken south bridge can still be purchased today 
and the box does not state "Secondary PCI bus throughput limited to +- 
25MB/s". You will not find this problem mentioned on their website either.

The board I tested is only 9 months old and when I pulled the SCSI card 
and discs and placed them on the 33MHz bus of an equivalent dual Xeon 
board, the throughput went up to +-90MB/s.

I was a big AMD fan prior to this, as the bang for the buck is way 
better, but the time, money and effort wasted left a bad taste.

Regards,

Richard

  reply	other threads:[~2004-10-18 18:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-18  2:11 Poor RAID5 performance on new SMP system Marc
2004-10-18  3:37 ` Guy
2004-10-18  4:04   ` Marc
2004-10-18  5:12     ` Guy
2004-10-18  3:44 ` Richard Scobie
2004-10-18  4:56   ` Marc
2004-10-18 17:26   ` Marc Marais
2004-10-18 18:41     ` Richard Scobie [this message]
2004-10-18 20:45       ` Guy
2004-10-20  3:24       ` Mark Hahn
2004-10-18  5:37 ` Gerd Knops
2004-10-18  6:12   ` Guy
2004-10-18  7:33     ` Marc

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41740E71.4090907@sauce.co.nz \
    --to=richard@sauce.co.nz \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.