From: Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>
To: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Cc: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>, Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6] dev.c: clear SIOCGIFHWADDR buffer if !dev->addr_len
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 11:34:34 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041101173434.GA12437@lists.us.dell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041101044433.GA18772@lists.us.dell.com>
On Sun, Oct 31, 2004 at 10:44:33PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> I think -EOVERFLOW would be appropriate return for dev->addr_len >
> sizeof sa_data, yes?
>
> I'd prefer though, that an "obsolete" function, be marked as such
> somehow (perhaps print a net_ratelimit()ed KERN_DEBUG message when
> it's called telling apps to move to rtnetlink), and that the behaviour
> for everything except overflow be consistent with the prior
> implementation, at least until such a time that all the apps in the
> distros are converted to rtnetlink.
How's this look?
This makes ioctl(SIOCIFHWADDR) behavior in 2.6 consistent with that of
previous kernels wherever possible. It returns -EOVERFLOW if it can't
represent the address, zeros the data if dev->addr_len is zero, and
prints a KERN_DEBUG message telling people to fix their applications
to use rtnetlink.
Compiles on x86 and x86-64 cleanly.
Signed-off-by: Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>
--
Matt Domsch
Sr. Software Engineer, Lead Engineer
Dell Linux Solutions linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
Linux on Dell mailing lists @ http://lists.us.dell.com
===== net/core/dev.c 1.169 vs edited =====
--- 1.169/net/core/dev.c 2004-10-26 11:09:33 -05:00
+++ edited/net/core/dev.c 2004-11-01 11:20:25 -06:00
@@ -2375,8 +2375,16 @@
return dev_set_mtu(dev, ifr->ifr_mtu);
case SIOCGIFHWADDR:
- memcpy(ifr->ifr_hwaddr.sa_data, dev->dev_addr,
- min(sizeof ifr->ifr_hwaddr.sa_data, (size_t) dev->addr_len));
+ if (net_ratelimit())
+ printk(KERN_DEBUG "Warning: %s uses obsolete ioctl(SIOCGIFHWADDR), please convert it to rtnetlink(3,7)\n", current->comm);
+
+ if ((size_t) dev->addr_len > sizeof ifr->ifr_hwaddr.sa_data)
+ return -EOVERFLOW;
+ else if (!dev->addr_len)
+ memset(ifr->ifr_hwaddr.sa_data, 0, sizeof ifr->ifr_hwaddr.sa_data);
+ else
+ memcpy(ifr->ifr_hwaddr.sa_data, dev->dev_addr,
+ min(sizeof ifr->ifr_hwaddr.sa_data, (size_t) dev->addr_len));
ifr->ifr_hwaddr.sa_family = dev->type;
return 0;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-01 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-29 21:51 [PATCH 2.6] dev.c: clear SIOCGIFHWADDR buffer if !dev->addr_len Matt Domsch
2004-10-30 1:37 ` Matt Domsch
2004-10-30 1:51 ` Herbert Xu
2004-10-30 3:09 ` Matt Domsch
2004-10-30 19:10 ` jamal
2004-11-01 4:44 ` Matt Domsch
2004-11-01 17:34 ` Matt Domsch [this message]
2004-11-01 20:27 ` Herbert Xu
2004-11-01 20:38 ` Matt Domsch
2004-11-01 20:41 ` Herbert Xu
2004-11-01 20:45 ` Matt Domsch
2004-11-01 21:50 ` jamal
2004-11-01 21:59 ` Matt Domsch
2004-11-01 22:06 ` Herbert Xu
2004-11-04 0:07 ` David S. Miller
2004-11-04 3:42 ` Matt Domsch
2004-11-01 22:03 ` Herbert Xu
2004-10-30 1:48 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041101173434.GA12437@lists.us.dell.com \
--to=matt_domsch@dell.com \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.