From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com
Cc: Amit Shah <amit.shah@codito.com>,
Karsten Wiese <annabellesgarden@yahoo.de>,
Bill Huey <bhuey@lnxw.com>, Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org>,
emann@mrv.com, Gunther Persoons <gunther_persoons@spymac.com>,
"K.R. Foley" <kr@cybsft.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Florian Schmidt <mista.tapas@gmx.net>,
Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>,
Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
Rui Nuno Capela <rncbc@rncbc.org>,
Shane Shrybman <shrybman@aei.ca>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Michal Schmidt <xschmi00@stud.feec.vutbr.cz>
Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc1-mm3-V0.7.23
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 12:38:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041111113804.GA16645@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OF2E0C528F.031A66E9-ON86256F48.00609DC6-86256F48.00609DDD@raytheon.com>
* Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com <Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com> wrote:
> >you have to build another kernel for them. irqs-off and preempt-off
> >timing can be mixed freely (and both can be enabled in the same kernel),
> >but wakeup timing deserves its own .config space and since it's not
> >mixable with the other two methods i didnt see much point in enabling
> >all 3 at once with strange dependencies between them. Is this a big
> >issue? Normally i think the wakeup timing is more than enough to get a
> >feel of latencies, and if something specific is suspected the other ones
> >can be turned on.
>
> Just that it takes an hour or so to rebuild the kernel plus the disk
> storage to keep two kernels instead of one.
ok, i added runtime configurability of the 3 options back, so that you
can build all 3 in and switch between them via the preempt_wakeup_timing
flag. Will be in the next release.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-11 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-10 17:35 [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc1-mm3-V0.7.23 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-11-11 11:38 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-11-10 17:31 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-11-10 15:57 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-11-10 17:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-10 14:51 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-11-11 12:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-10 14:12 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-11-10 14:08 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-11-10 15:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-09 21:07 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-11-09 23:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-09 23:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-21 13:27 [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U9 Ingo Molnar
2004-10-22 13:35 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-rc4-mm1-U9.3 Ingo Molnar
2004-10-22 15:50 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-mm1-U10 Ingo Molnar
2004-10-22 17:56 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-mm1-U10.2 Ingo Molnar
2004-10-25 10:40 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-mm1-V0 Ingo Molnar
2004-10-27 0:15 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-mm1-V0.3 Ingo Molnar
2004-11-03 10:58 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc1-mm2-V0.7.1 Ingo Molnar
2004-11-06 15:57 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc1-mm3-V0.7.18 Ingo Molnar
2004-11-08 9:16 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc1-mm3-V0.7.19 Ingo Molnar
2004-11-08 16:57 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc1-mm3-V0.7.21 Ingo Molnar
2004-11-09 16:05 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc1-mm3-V0.7.23 Ingo Molnar
2004-11-10 13:52 ` Karsten Wiese
2004-11-10 13:58 ` Karsten Wiese
2004-11-10 15:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-10 14:20 ` Karsten Wiese
2004-11-10 14:50 ` Karsten Wiese
2004-11-10 15:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-11 4:34 ` K.R. Foley
2004-11-11 5:01 ` K.R. Foley
2004-11-11 9:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-11 10:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-11 13:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-11 12:27 ` K.R. Foley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041111113804.GA16645@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com \
--cc=amit.shah@codito.com \
--cc=annabellesgarden@yahoo.de \
--cc=bhuey@lnxw.com \
--cc=doogie@debian.org \
--cc=emann@mrv.com \
--cc=gunther_persoons@spymac.com \
--cc=kr@cybsft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mista.tapas@gmx.net \
--cc=nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=rncbc@rncbc.org \
--cc=shrybman@aei.ca \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=xschmi00@stud.feec.vutbr.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.