From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: "Prakash K. Cheemplavam" <prakashkc@gmx.de>
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au
Subject: Re: Time sliced CFQ io scheduler
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 10:43:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041203094314.GF10492@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41B03375.4050702@gmx.de>
On Fri, Dec 03 2004, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote:
> Jens Axboe schrieb:
> >On Fri, Dec 03 2004, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote:
> >
> >>Jens Axboe schrieb:
> >>
> >>>On Thu, Dec 02 2004, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote:
> >>>
> >>
> >>>>0 3 3080 2208 1156 817712 0 0 3592 75624 1326 2289 1 36
> >>>>0 63
> >>>>0 3 3080 2664 1156 818240 0 0 5124 15692 1302 992 1 18
> >>>>0 81
> >>>>0 3 3080 2580 1160 815832 0 0 4356 155792 1375 1064 1
> >>>>39 0 60
> >>>>0 3 3080 2472 1160 817124 0 0 3076 100852 1345 1138 1
> >>>>23 0 76
> >>>>2 4 3080 2836 1148 816228 0 0 3336 100412 1352 1379 1
> >>>>47 0 52
> >>>>0 4 3080 2708 1144 815964 0 0 3844 48908 1343 871 1 25
> >>>>0 74
> >>>>0 3 3080 2748 1152 815984 0 0 3332 71996 1338 843 1 27
> >>>>0 72
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Can you try with the patch that is in the parent of this thread? The
> >>>above doesn't look that bad, although read performance could be better
> >>>of course. But try with the patch please, I'm sure it should help you
> >>>quite a lot.
> >>>
> >>
> >>It actually got worse: Though the read rate seems accepteble, it is not,
> >>as interactivity is dead while writing. I cannot start porgrammes, other
> >>programmes which want to do i/o pretty much hang. This is only while
> >>writing. While reading there is no such problem.
> >
> >
> >Interesting, thanks for testing. I'll run some tests here as well, so
> >far only the cases mentioned yesterday have been tested.
>
> BTW, in case it is misread: Above (except the io performance as such) is
> no regression: The other schedulers behave the same on my system.
Yes, that's what I assumed. Another thing to keep in mind is that even
with just a single writer, you could have 3 people doing writeout for
you (pdflush for each disk, and the writer itself), while the reader is
on its own. This could affect latencies/bandwidth for the reader in
not-so pleasant ways.
> >You could try and bumb the slice period. But I'll experiment and see
> >what happens. What is your test case?
>
> [slice bumping] Uhm, is it doable via proc? I haven't seen text docs to
> your patch and I am not good at kernel code ;-)
:-)
See my previous mail, it tells you how to do it.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-03 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-02 13:04 Time sliced CFQ io scheduler Jens Axboe
2004-12-02 13:48 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-02 19:48 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-02 19:52 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-02 20:19 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-02 20:19 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-02 20:34 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-02 20:37 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-07 23:11 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-02 22:18 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-12-03 7:01 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-03 9:12 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-12-03 9:18 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-03 9:35 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-12-03 9:43 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2004-12-03 9:26 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-03 9:34 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-12-03 9:39 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-03 9:54 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
[not found] ` <41B03722.5090001@gmx.de>
2004-12-03 10:31 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-03 10:38 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-03 10:45 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-12-03 10:48 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-03 11:27 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-12-03 11:29 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-03 11:52 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-12-08 0:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-08 0:54 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-08 1:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-08 1:47 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-08 2:09 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-08 2:11 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-08 2:22 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-08 6:52 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-08 2:00 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-08 2:08 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-08 6:55 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-08 2:20 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-08 2:25 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-08 2:33 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-08 2:33 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-08 2:51 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-08 3:02 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-08 6:58 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-08 7:14 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-08 7:20 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-08 7:29 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-08 7:32 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-08 7:30 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-08 7:36 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-08 13:48 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-08 6:55 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-08 7:08 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-08 7:11 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-08 7:19 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-08 7:26 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-08 9:35 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-08 10:08 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-08 12:47 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-08 10:52 ` Helge Hafting
2004-12-08 10:49 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-08 6:49 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-02 14:28 ` Giuliano Pochini
2004-12-02 14:41 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-04 13:05 ` Giuliano Pochini
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-12-03 20:52 Chuck Ebbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041203094314.GF10492@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=prakashkc@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.